NationStates

viewtopic.php?p=22576166#p22576166
viewtopic.php?p=22576173#p22576173
viewtopic.php?p=22576175#p22576175

I think I remember seeing rulings about people who do this sort of passive-aggressive "flaming" get called out for it before.

Seems to have settled down for now.

Just for clarification, my response was against the rules? And if it is, that's fine, I will stop.

I thought it was a clever way of showing distain for a posters posts, without violating the rules with a personal attack.

Ethel mermania wrote:Just for clarification, my response was against the rules? And if it is, that's fine, I will stop.

I thought it was a clever way of showing distain for a posters posts, without violating the rules with a personal attack.

If it continues on, yes. I'd view it as baiting and possibly spam.

NERVUN wrote:

Ethel mermania wrote:Just for clarification, my response was against the rules? And if it is, that's fine, I will stop.

I thought it was a clever way of showing distain for a posters posts, without violating the rules with a personal attack.

If it continues on, yes. I'd view it as baiting and possibly spam.

Fair enough, thanks for the quick response.

NERVUN wrote:

Ethel mermania wrote:Just for clarification, my response was against the rules? And if it is, that's fine, I will stop.

I thought it was a clever way of showing distain for a posters posts, without violating the rules with a personal attack.

If it continues on, yes. I'd view it as baiting and possibly spam.

Good to know for future reference. Thanks, Nervun.