by Cornupication » Sun Nov 23, 2014 5:55 pm
by Reploid Productions » Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:25 pm
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Economa Incorporated » Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:27 pm
by District XIV » Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:33 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:*** White, bold text on a red background, even with the asterisks *** isn't against the rules; that only crosses into mod impersonation if the contents are trying to pose as a mod as well.
Frisbeeteria wrote:Geanna wrote:Player Has Been Secretly Deleted IRL
Let's not use Mod Text emulation even as a joke, please.
by Reploid Productions » Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:35 pm
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Geanna » Sun Nov 23, 2014 7:10 pm
District XIV wrote:Reploid Productions wrote:*** White, bold text on a red background, even with the asterisks *** isn't against the rules; that only crosses into mod impersonation if the contents are trying to pose as a mod as well.
Then what was this about?:Frisbeeteria wrote:Let's not use Mod Text emulation even as a joke, please.
by Frisbeeteria » Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:57 pm
District XIV wrote:Then what was this about?:
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:00 pm
Economa Incorporated wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=356758
This would count though, correct?
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Furry Alairia and Algeria » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:04 pm
by Frisbeeteria » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:10 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Just checking, since I'm not seeing an answer for his question in here anywhere. This looks a lot more like the actual code, is this not allowed?
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Maybe Fris could use a bubble-bath, a nice glass of red, and a night off?
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:19 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:Missed your post.
Yes, it was using the actual code. It was reported in the Sigs megathread, and had already been removed) and *** warned *** by the time I got to this thread.Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Maybe Fris could use a bubble-bath, a nice glass of red, and a night off?
I'd be happier if certain DOS players weren't so adamant about showing their ass every night or two. Not a fan of bubble baths, either.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Frisbeeteria » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:28 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote: what drop down menu item is best? Report a spammer? WA cheater? Other?)
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:38 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Frisbeeteria » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:57 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:I wondered if it just gave it some kind of a heading for you to look at
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:01 am
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Geanna » Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:06 am
by The Blaatschapen » Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:28 am
Reploid Productions wrote:He's not actually using the warn code itself, and in the context of the sig in question, it's pretty clear he's making a joke about himself, rather than anything actually trying to pose as anything official.
*** White, bold text on a red background, even with the asterisks *** isn't against the rules; that only crosses into mod impersonation if the contents are trying to pose as a mod as well. The actual *** warn code *** is specifically designed so that it is impossible to completely imitate using any combination of other BBcodes, since the warn code adds that black box around it, as well as changing the display font- outside of the warn code, there is no other way to make that border (table tags don't display the same way, so you can't use a table to get the same outline effect,) or to change the display font.
But yeah, the actual warn tag itself is still prohibited in sigs, too.
by Frisbeeteria » Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:38 am
The Blaatschapen wrote: The actual *** warn code *** is. So that's another noticeable difference.
by Manisdog » Mon Nov 24, 2014 4:33 am
Reploid Productions wrote:He's not actually using the warn code itself, and in the context of the sig in question, it's pretty clear he's making a joke about himself, rather than anything actually trying to pose as anything official.
*** White, bold text on a red background, even with the asterisks *** isn't against the rules; that only crosses into mod impersonation if the contents are trying to pose as a mod as well. The actual *** warn code *** is specifically designed so that it is impossible to completely imitate using any combination of other BBcodes, since the warn code adds that black box around it, as well as changing the display font- outside of the warn code, there is no other way to make that border (table tags don't display the same way, so you can't use a table to get the same outline effect,) or to change the display font.
But yeah, the actual warn tag itself is still prohibited in sigs, too.
by Geanna » Mon Nov 24, 2014 5:55 am
Manisdog wrote:Reploid Productions wrote:He's not actually using the warn code itself, and in the context of the sig in question, it's pretty clear he's making a joke about himself, rather than anything actually trying to pose as anything official.
*** White, bold text on a red background, even with the asterisks *** isn't against the rules; that only crosses into mod impersonation if the contents are trying to pose as a mod as well. The actual *** warn code *** is specifically designed so that it is impossible to completely imitate using any combination of other BBcodes, since the warn code adds that black box around it, as well as changing the display font- outside of the warn code, there is no other way to make that border (table tags don't display the same way, so you can't use a table to get the same outline effect,) or to change the display font.
But yeah, the actual warn tag itself is still prohibited in sigs, too.
just seeing that the color=#FFFFFF is the sign for the mod code, how would it be impossible to impersonate ?
Why are some moderators blue and some red and some light green ?
by Northwest Slobovia » Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:34 am
Manisdog wrote:Reploid Productions wrote:He's not actually using the warn code itself, and in the context of the sig in question, it's pretty clear he's making a joke about himself, rather than anything actually trying to pose as anything official.isn't against the rules; that only crosses into mod impersonation if the contents are trying to pose as a mod as well. The actual
- Code: Select all
[b][color=#FFFFFF][background=red]*** White, bold text on a red background, even with the asterisks ***[/background][/color][/b]
is specifically designed so that it is impossible to completely imitate using any combination of other BBcodes, since the warn code adds that black box around it, as well as changing the display font- outside of the warn code, there is no other way to make that border (table tags don't display the same way, so you can't use a table to get the same outline effect,) or to change the display font.
- Code: Select all
[warn]warn code[/warn]
But yeah, the actual warn tag itself is still prohibited in sigs, too.
just seeing that the color=#FFFFFF is the sign for the mod code, how would it be impossible to impersonate ?
[warn][/warn]
by Geanna » Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:50 am
Northwest Slobovia wrote:Manisdog wrote:
just seeing that the color=#FFFFFF is the sign for the mod code, how would it be impossible to impersonate ?
It's not. I've marked up Reppy's message to show the actual code involved: to get exactly effect of, you need to use that tag. And then the moderators will spank you.
- Code: Select all
[warn][/warn]
by Buyan » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:20 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:*** White, bold text on a red background, even with the asterisks *** is not white in the Dark theme. The actual *** warn code *** is. So that's another noticeable difference.
by The Blaatschapen » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:23 am
Buyan wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:*** White, bold text on a red background, even with the asterisks *** is not white in the Dark theme. The actual *** warn code *** is. So that's another noticeable difference.
My apologies if it has been mentioned before, but, using dark theme, both texts appear in white to me. Just as an fyi.
by Buyan » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:26 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Infected Mushroom, Kainin, Phydios
Advertisement