[REPORT] Flaming on White History Thread

[Soldati Senza Confini]

I don't know why people keep pointing to China. Africa and India are where power's gonna gather over the next century or so.

You are clearly stupid. Africa and India will become Chinese colonies within our lifetimes. You don't know what the hell you're talking about. Go back to school and get an education.

[-Ebola-]

There is also some baiting a couple of posts later:

The Chinese are already colonizing east Africa. They will replicate the British Raj and use India's class divide to colonize. India will host cheap labor and Africa will become a giant mine for China.

Get an education or you'll be like this OP who created this thread.

[Esternial]

Again it seems necessary for me to clarify for you that these are insults, not arguments.

Edgy poster admitting to it himself.

[Dracoria]

Oh, you're just an idiot then.

You're giving me a larger sense of self satisfaction, dealing with the fact that all that oppose me are as moronic as you.

Not just insulting Occidentria, but the rest of those who are arguing with them.

[Dread Lady Nathicana]

Addressed.

[Old Tyrannia]

I wasn't sure whether to post a new thread or just bring this up in this one, but:

10-200 is a downright autistic sample range, unless you meant 10-20 years.

Using the term "autistic" in this way seems rather offensive to people with ASDs.

I don't believe that it's nineteen or that it's female.

Referring to another poster as "it." I seem to remember this being actionable in the past, though I can't recall specifics.

I think Occidentria deserves a slap on the wrist at the very least.

[Frisbeeteria]

Using the term "autistic" in this way seems rather offensive to people with ASDs.

I'm assuming poor word choice, not intent to offend.

Referring to another poster as "it.

What other poster? I can't tell what that's in reference to - the photos of the skull, maybe?

I think Occidentria deserves a slap on the wrist at the very least.

Not for that. I think you're reaching for an excuse, not looking at actual violations.

[Old Tyrannia]

Using the term "autistic" in this way seems rather offensive to people with ASDs.

I'm assuming poor word choice, not intent to offend.

It's still pretty damn offensive to use the word "autistic" as a term to imply something is stupid/bad/ill-thought-out as Occidentria did, regardless of intent.

Referring to another poster as "it.

What other poster? I can't tell what that's in reference to - the photos of the skull, maybe?

They're clearly referring to Fascistic Republic of Canada. Her signature says that she's nineteen and female; Occidentria saying "I don't believe that it's nineteen or that it's female" is clearly a reference to her.

I think Occidentria deserves a slap on the wrist at the very least.

Not for that. I think you're reaching for an excuse, not looking at actual violations.

Why would I be looking for an excuse? I'm not debating against him in the thread. I'm actually on their side in their debate against FRC, but I think that their comments constitute a breach of the rules and I don't think they should get away with them just because the person they're arguing against has some unsavoury views.

I would like a second opinion.

[Farnhamia]

I'm assuming poor word choice, not intent to offend.

It's still pretty damn offensive to use the word "autistic" as a term to imply something is stupid/bad/ill-thought-out as Occidentria did, regardless of intent.

What other poster? I can't tell what that's in reference to - the photos of the skull, maybe?

They're clearly referring to Fascistic Republic of Canada. Her signature says that she's nineteen and female; Occidentria saying "I don't believe that it's nineteen or that it's female" is clearly a reference to her.

Not for that. I think you're reaching for an excuse, not looking at actual violations.

Why would I be looking for an excuse? I'm not debating against him in the thread. I'm actually on their side in their debate against FRC, but I think that their comments constitute a breach of the rules and I don't think they should get away with them just because the person they're arguing against has some unsavoury views.

I would like a second opinion.

Second opinion: Occidentria gets an unofficial warning for using "autistic" as a pejorative, in the sense of "dumb."

[Old Tyrannia]

Thanks for your previous response, Farn. I hate to pester you guys, but...

Wrote a long response but for some reason it did connect.

TL;DR Version.

Marvopen,

Yes it's probably a theme because you have an autistic persistance with posting walls of texts from idiot academics who grew up in nice all white neighborhoodsand then try to tell anyone who beleives in the reality of race that their evil and wrong by setting out with the premise beforehand that race doesn't exist (obviously you care enough to put it in your signature).

Conformation Bias as you pointed out.

Maybe people who beleive race exist actually have other things to do than discuss it for an hour when their original post wasn't about argueing the existance of race(shocking i know) but if you want to chock it up as great intellectual Victory be my guest. It has nothing to do with ebarassment i don't care enough about what you think to possibly be embarrassed (Someone who has a fixation on Anime, Ponies and Nationstates forums apparently) yeah blah blah ad hominem whatever.

Now go along and spend more time talking about how im just so embarressed that you disproved my views by reposting useless wall of text over and over.

P.S. White Power 1488

Emphasis mine. We have here using "autistic" as a pejorative (again, though different person), personal attacks, and "White Power 1488", a white nationalist/neo-Nazi slogan. Is any of this actionable?