{R} calling for death (Ukraine thread)

[The balkens]

And that is them. What do you want me to do about it? As you said they are "Pro-Kiev forces" and not the Army.

How about NOT cheering for bastards that were killing innocent people in Donetsk for months? If they GTFO on their own (or in coffins) from their postitions this would be a good news for Donetsk civillians.

I actually do hope they launch a full scale offensive. So much they knouck Ukraine back to Kiev, and to the point they over extend their supply lines which its then cut off so badly, the Russian/rebel front line is crushed, leaving most of the rebel force dazed and confused to where a swift counter-attack knocks out the DNR and LNR out cold and Ukraine with the victory. Alas, that is such a wet dream as yours is, none which will happen anyway. So we both go away unhappy.

You, probably, imaging that 'cause you beleive (under what information agancy influence, I'm not sure), that "sepratists" are some sort of invaders, No, they are not. They are only defending their home - Donbas resion. So, no, militiamen have no desire to go after Kiev or Western Ukraine.

And, as a side note, for a "wift counter-attack" that "knocks out the DNR and LNR out cold and Ukraine with the victory." there, in theory, should be forces remaing to do that. If, in the absolutely inprobable situation of Novorossiyan forces reaching Kiev, then it means only that Kiev has literally no one left to defend itself. The situation even now is horrible - read my previous posts, if your personal beleifs do not prevent you from going just several pages back.

EDIT: fixed broken qoute.
Bolded mine.

EDIT 2:

And what I beleive, чувачелло, is that if Russian forces were indeed "pouring into Ukraine now", by the end of the week Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, Tyahnibok and all of their camarilla who wouldn't eascape to the West, would be by their nut-sacks and Lviv would experience short and brutal process of de-Nazification

Bold 1. Getting graphic with the word-imagery there
Bold 2. Historically considering the Russian process of "De-Nazification" and how it would be "brutal" (his own words) i also feel this is rather... Extreme.

[Oaledonia]

-snip-

C'mon, Westerners! Rejoice! Ukraine is choosing you! Just look at all their efforts!

(Image)

Same poster, seems a bit baity.

[Germanic Templars]

-snip-

C'mon, Westerners! Rejoice! Ukraine is choosing you! Just look at all their efforts!

(Image)

Same poster, seems a bit baity.

Meh, I to am owning up to my mistakes, got a bit heated there really, not know what I wrote would be considered, but i'll let the mods decide and accept any punishment they deem necessary.

[The balkens]

Can I get a status, please?

[Dread Lady Nathicana]

Not any worse than tends to go on in highly emotional threads, no. Unpopular, yes, but isn't really 'calling for death'.

[Constantinopolis]

Because this sort of thing has been reported before, I'd like a clarification from the mods about what precisely is or isn't acceptable to say regarding the deaths of people currently fighting in a war (namely, either the armed combatants or their commanders).

In a war, each faction is trying to kill the enemy. Anyone who expresses support for any faction currently fighting a war is implicitly wishing death upon that faction's enemies. Is it against the rules to make this wish explicit? So "I want X to win the war" is ok, but "I want the enemies of X to die" is not - even though X winning the war necessarily requires them to kill at least some of their enemies?

That would seem rather bizarre, but if it is indeed the rule, I'd like to have official confirmation of it.

Edit: Ninja'd by Nathicana.

[Dread Lady Nathicana]

Case by case basis, same as always.

[Constantinopolis]

Case by case basis, same as always.

Got it. Thanks!

[Oaledonia]

Thanks for clarification.