by Roski » Sun Sep 14, 2014 2:50 pm
by Greater Weselton » Sun Sep 14, 2014 5:39 pm
by Bezkoshtovnya » Sun Sep 14, 2014 7:23 pm
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Reploid Productions » Sun Sep 14, 2014 7:44 pm
Greater Weselton wrote:We have a desire to have this thread rescued. We want all posts deleted beyond this one:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=21741376#p21741376 That is where the godmoding and spam starts. We want to continue the war. We will keep it a good RP.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Greater Weselton » Sun Sep 14, 2014 8:03 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:No worries, Bezkoshtovnya- your post brought up new information relevant to the original report, so it's not spamming.Greater Weselton wrote:We have a desire to have this thread rescued. We want all posts deleted beyond this one:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=21741376#p21741376 That is where the godmoding and spam starts. We want to continue the war. We will keep it a good RP.
No, the godmoding and spam started the moment you tried to invade after the other player said they weren't interested. Nationstates roleplay is very much based on the notion of "You don't have to play with anyone you don't want to." Elemental North should probably have come to Moderation after you attempted to continue despite their protest rather than cave in and help turn the thread into such a circus show. I see no reason to reopen the thread; if you want to roleplay a war, make sure the other player(s) are okay with it before you go ahead, it will save you a lot of headaches and annoyance in the long run.
by Bezkoshtovnya » Sun Sep 14, 2014 8:04 pm
Greater Weselton wrote:Reploid Productions wrote:No worries, Bezkoshtovnya- your post brought up new information relevant to the original report, so it's not spamming.
No, the godmoding and spam started the moment you tried to invade after the other player said they weren't interested. Nationstates roleplay is very much based on the notion of "You don't have to play with anyone you don't want to." Elemental North should probably have come to Moderation after you attempted to continue despite their protest rather than cave in and help turn the thread into such a circus show. I see no reason to reopen the thread; if you want to roleplay a war, make sure the other player(s) are okay with it before you go ahead, it will save you a lot of headaches and annoyance in the long run.
Elemental North later got involved in the war, so the consent part of your argument is taken out. They wilfully participated in the RP.
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Greater Weselton » Sun Sep 14, 2014 8:08 pm
Bezkoshtovnya wrote:Greater Weselton wrote:Elemental North later got involved in the war, so the consent part of your argument is taken out. They wilfully participated in the RP.
(Sorry again if this is spam)
However, he clearly originally did not want any part of this. He only joined it, as he mentioned, because the rest of the IFC dragged him into it. He never willingly wanted to engage in it.
by Reploid Productions » Sun Sep 14, 2014 9:02 pm
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Greater Weselton » Mon Sep 15, 2014 4:22 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:I would suggest you start a new thread for your war, and as advised previously, contact the people you would like to have involved to make sure that they are available or interested in participating.
by Dread Lady Nathicana » Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:41 pm
by District XIV » Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:42 pm
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:No. If you insist on starting another war thread, do so with someone who is willing to rp one out with you. Otherwise, leave people alone. No one should be forced/gulled/cajoled/or otherwise pressured into an rp with anyone else. For any reason.
by Dread Lady Nathicana » Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:01 pm
by Greater Weselton » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:02 pm
by Dread Lady Nathicana » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:14 pm
by Greater Weselton » Tue Sep 16, 2014 4:21 pm
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Then start up one /unrelated/ to the others, and be sure the participants are actually willing. None of this 'we're going to declare and you have to deal with it' business.
by NERVUN » Tue Sep 16, 2014 5:28 pm
by Greater Weselton » Tue Sep 16, 2014 6:28 pm
by Dread Lady Nathicana » Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:40 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement