by Dyakovo » Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:49 pm
by The Republic of Lanos » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:20 pm
by Derptania » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:41 pm
by Dyakovo » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:44 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Nor is Dykovo being helpful here when responding to TFF: viewtopic.php?p=8126142#p8126142
by Katganistan » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:00 pm
by Dyakovo » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:06 pm
by Katganistan » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:39 pm
by Dyakovo » Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:07 pm
Katganistan wrote:Derptania's deletion was for posting past his forumban -- as he is the player who owned the nation TheIncorporation.
by Reploid Productions » Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:33 pm
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by BannablePuppet » Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:50 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:Speaking of TheIncorporation, lads and lasses, let's all take home this lesson:
Getting caught trying to hack into another player's nation is pretty much a fast-track ticket to Delete-On-Sight. Dedicated targeting of another player for repeated harassment via multiple nations (or a concentrated effort by more than one player; TFF, I'm looking at you, as we know you were collaborating with TheIncorporation to do so) is a good way to eventually earn your way up the warning ladder from knock-it-offs to *** official warnings *** to forumbans to deletions and eventually to a Delete-on-Sight, but generally harassment is less dire an offense than attempting to steal another player's nation.
So, I am sorry to say, TheIncorporation has been uninvited from the Nationstates website permanently. New nations he attempts to sneak back on the site will be deleted as we spot them. I would strongly recommend to TFF that he give up on the campaign of harassment, and suggest the straightforward solution of putting Dyakovo on ignore and do not acknowledge him at all. That way the temptation to continue flaming a player he clearly cannot address in a remotely civil manner should be removed and moderation involvement will stop being necessary.
(Image)
~Evil Forum Empress Rep Prod the Ninja Mod
~She who wields the Banhammer; master of the mighty moderation no-dachi Kiritateru Teikoku
by TFF » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:21 am
Reploid Productions wrote:Speaking of TheIncorporation, lads and lasses, let's all take home this lesson:
Getting caught trying to hack into another player's nation is pretty much a fast-track ticket to Delete-On-Sight. Dedicated targeting of another player for repeated harassment via multiple nations (or a concentrated effort by more than one player; TFF, I'm looking at you, as we know you were collaborating with TheIncorporation to do so) is a good way to eventually earn your way up the warning ladder from knock-it-offs to *** official warnings *** to forumbans to deletions and eventually to a Delete-on-Sight, but generally harassment is less dire an offense than attempting to steal another player's nation.
So, I am sorry to say, TheIncorporation has been uninvited from the Nationstates website permanently. New nations he attempts to sneak back on the site will be deleted as we spot them. I would strongly recommend to TFF that he give up on the campaign of harassment, and suggest the straightforward solution of putting Dyakovo on ignore and do not acknowledge him at all. That way the temptation to continue flaming a player he clearly cannot address in a remotely civil manner should be removed and moderation involvement will stop being necessary.
~Evil Forum Empress Rep Prod the Ninja Mod
~She who wields the Banhammer; master of the mighty moderation no-dachi Kiritateru Teikoku
by Frisbeeteria » Tue Jan 10, 2012 10:10 am
by Dyakovo » Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:00 am
by TFF » Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:32 pm
Dyakovo wrote:The original report that earned me TFF's enmity is here: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=158255
I did, as she claims, make a comment
Milks Empire wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Wow... Some people just don't learn...
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=158255
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=158275
*shakes head*
Oh, well... At least its entertaining watching people crash and burn...
That's some real derp-derp going on with that one, eh?
Dyakovo wrote:Milks Empire wrote:Oy vey.
Obviously he hasn't read many of my posts...
But, no... It must be that I'm thin-skinned and/or humourless... It couldn't possible be that after 6+ years here I'm pretty well acquainted with the rules... (Even if it is in part due to my habit of treading the line....)
Dyakovo wrote:TFF wrote:You are sooo awesome! 6+ years of "rule knowledge"on here, bunches of threads reporting other people posts, and then starting new posts in other threads pointing out the posts you reported..and yet still not given a mod position..
LOL!
Awww.... Look at that... Somebody is still butt-hurt about getting in trouble...
Dyakovo wrote:Samuraikoku wrote:
Not exactly a smart move coming to get you...
Meh...
I don't hold grudges, and frankly I really shouldn't have posted the stuff in this thread about it... I just thought it was too funny that after being told to take a look at the rules (and was provided with a link to the OSRS twice) that he'd continue to do things that are against the rules...
Some people just think they're special butterflies I guess...
Katganistan wrote:TFF wrote:You are sooo awesome! 6+ years of "rule knowledge"on here, bunches of threads reporting other people posts, and then starting new posts in other threads pointing out the posts you reported..and yet still not given a mod position..
LOL!
Let me be blunt. Cut the personal attacks now.
by Melkor Unchained » Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:50 pm
by TFF » Tue Jan 10, 2012 2:16 pm
Melkor Unchained wrote:Alright, I think all the relevant cards have been put on the table here. TFF, we're not going to act until we get a chance to talk to the moderator(s) who ruled on your case. TheIncorporation's ban will stand on the strength of rulebreaking beyond what has been discussed here, but Dyakovo's conduct in possibly escalating these events will be examined.
by Melkor Unchained » Tue Jan 10, 2012 2:47 pm
by Dyakovo » Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:23 pm
by Katganistan » Tue Jan 10, 2012 4:18 pm
More LOL! Sweetie, you aren't a former Sea Shepherd "fighter" nor a former member of Japans whaling industry nor a member of the ICW. By your own admission you're a kid who drives a broke down truck. State your opinion on the thread subject and refrain from telling others what they do or don't know. mkay?
ps. nice job running and reporting me for flamebaiting you. Congrats on your 346th "Run-Tell" thread!
More LOL! Do yourself a favor and stay on topic without attempting to flame people. Your 345th run-tell THREAD in the moderation forum whining about someone "attacking" you again was epic fail and number 346 ain't looking good either.
LOL. Let it go little boy. You were shut down the last time you tried trolling me and I'll have you shut down again. Don't start snding me "I'm sorry telegrams" again either.
by TFF » Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:36 pm
Katganistan wrote:For information's sake only -- I did actually read the thread
Due diligence and all that.
by NERVUN » Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:45 pm
TFF wrote:Katganistan wrote:For information's sake only -- I did actually read the thread
Due diligence and all that.
And yet strangely enough you failed to include the first post where he initiated the flame attack. Perhaps your failure to include that in your above post was a mistake or maybe you just forgot? I'm not really sure but I do know you also failed to include my post in that thread telling you that exact thing and your reply of calling me "the one with the problem " so maybe you thought you better not include that in "due diligence" reporting...
by Dyakovo » Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:49 pm
NERVUN wrote:TFF wrote:
And yet strangely enough you failed to include the first post where he initiated the flame attack. Perhaps your failure to include that in your above post was a mistake or maybe you just forgot? I'm not really sure but I do know you also failed to include my post in that thread telling you that exact thing and your reply of calling me "the one with the problem " so maybe you thought you better not include that in "due diligence" reporting...
That was me and honestly a flinging of "You don't know what you're talking about" is rather mild and rather SOP for this board. However, continuing on something you had previously been told to stop... THAT'S a bit different.
by NERVUN » Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:52 pm
Dyakovo wrote:NERVUN wrote:That was me and honestly a flinging of "You don't know what you're talking about" is rather mild and rather SOP for this board. However, continuing on something you had previously been told to stop... THAT'S a bit different.
Actually Kat told her the same thing, pretty much word for word...
by TFF » Tue Jan 10, 2012 7:07 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Just wanted to point out the fact that two of the posts that TFF alleges are samples of me baiting her are comments about a TG sent to me by TheIncorporation… Which, at least to me raises the question of how am I baiting her by making comments about someone she supppsedly doesn't know?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Savonir
Advertisement