NATION

PASSWORD

[R] - Gun Talk Flamebaiting

Who needs it, who got it, who hands it out and why.
User avatar
American Imperial State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 692
Founded: Feb 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

[R] - Gun Talk Flamebaiting

Postby American Imperial State » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:43 pm

Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
American Imperial State wrote:Yep, if the liberals try to take/regulate our guns and cause a Second civil war, that's shtf.


HAHAHAHAHAHA. No. Its called a tiny temper tantrum quickly quashed by the properly trained army and police forces. Seriously your not delusional enough to think that a rag tag team of tactitards can take on the United States Military, are you?


referring to people in that thread as 'honey' in a condescending tone and referring to board members as a 'rag tag team of tactitards' and 'delusional' seems over the line. the constant 'honey' thing is pretty flamebaity.

Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
Husseinarti wrote:Also you have literally no idea what issues would come to be in the event of a Second US Civil War if you really think that it'd be that simple. Like, seriously do you know what a civil war is?


:rofl:

I know what a fucking civil war is honey. I'm not retarded. Like, Jesus. I said it wouldn't even be worth calling a fucking Civil War.


Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
American Imperial State wrote:You're not delusional enough to think that such a rag tag team of 'tactitards' would try to fight the U.S. military conventionally, do you?


They'd still get crushed, honey. Besides, your assuming large enough numbers of them would be able to form any kind of coherent group in time before SWAT teams handled swaths of them as individuals.

Or that the incredibly conservative U.S. military members would be willing to engage in such a long-term guerilla war against their own people?


If the Second Amendment was repealed through due process, then yeah, they would. Because its their fucking job.

the U.S. Military, i'm sad to say, has a less than stellar record when it comes to fighting insurgencies.


Not true. US politicians have a shitty record of keeping boot applied to throat.

Let alone in the massive United States in large mountains, rural and urban environments.


Many American service people grew up in those mountains. They train in them. Its literally home turf for them.

Afghanistan and Vietnam would be peanuts.


And? The US military, contrary to what people shove down your throat, has performed remarkably in both environments.
Last edited by American Imperial State on Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Wenn Alle Untreu Werden

User avatar
Renewed Imperial Germany
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6928
Founded: Jun 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Renewed Imperial Germany » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:48 pm

American Imperial State wrote:
Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHA. No. Its called a tiny temper tantrum quickly quashed by the properly trained army and police forces. Seriously your not delusional enough to think that a rag tag team of tactitards can take on the United States Military, are you?


referring to people in that thread as 1. 'honey' in a condescending tone and referring to board members as a 2. 'rag tag team of tactitards' seems over the line. the constant 'honey' thing is pretty flamebaity.

Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
:rofl:

I know what a fucking civil war is honey. I'm not retarded. Like, Jesus. I said it wouldn't even be worth calling a fucking Civil War.


Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
They'd still get crushed, honey. Besides, your assuming large enough numbers of them would be able to form any kind of coherent group in time before SWAT teams handled swaths of them as individuals.



If the Second Amendment was repealed through due process, then yeah, they would. Because its their fucking job.



Not true. US politicians have a shitty record of keeping boot applied to throat.



Many American service people grew up in those mountains. They train in them. Its literally home turf for them.



And? The US military, contrary to what people shove down your throat, has performed remarkably in both environments.


1. Literally have been using the 'honey' line for like forever and never once been warned for it

2. No, I was referring to the militia types, not board members.
Bailey Quinn, Nice ta meet ya! (Female Pronouns Please)
Also known as Harley
NS Stats are not used here.
<3 Alex's NS Wife <3
Normal is a setting on the dryer

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13799
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:54 pm

As a longtime poster in that thread, and as someone whom has membership to what very easily would be considered a "militia" by people who are uneducated on the subject matter, I very much don't appreciate being refereed to as a "tactitard" by any stretch of means. If moderation would like proof to my claim to verify my point, Moderation is free to TG me at any point about it.

My 2 cents to add some context to the reported matter.
Last edited by Paddy O Fernature on Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
American Imperial State
Diplomat
 
Posts: 692
Founded: Feb 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby American Imperial State » Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:58 pm

Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
American Imperial State wrote:
referring to people in that thread as 1. 'honey' in a condescending tone and referring to board members as a 2. 'rag tag team of tactitards' seems over the line. the constant 'honey' thing is pretty flamebaity.





1. Literally have been using the 'honey' line for like forever and never once been warned for it

2. No, I was referring to the militia types, not board members.


I think a great many of us consider ourselves part of the 'unorganized' militia. It was clear to me, anyway, that you were referring to people who owned weapons and consider themselves a 'miltia' to be tactitards. perhaps even general gun owners who collect or prepare for shtf scenarios. 'tactitards' didn't seem directed necessarily at people engaged in active guerilla war or of the opinion that it was feasible against the U.S. military.

I don't know how long you've been using the 'honey' line, but at the time, i thought it was somewhat condescending. especially calling people who think, in their opinion, that a militia could face off in a guerilla war with the U.S. military 'delusional'.
Last edited by American Imperial State on Tue Aug 23, 2016 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wenn Alle Untreu Werden

User avatar
Renewed Imperial Germany
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6928
Founded: Jun 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Renewed Imperial Germany » Tue Aug 23, 2016 2:18 pm

American Imperial State wrote:
Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
1. Literally have been using the 'honey' line for like forever and never once been warned for it

2. No, I was referring to the militia types, not board members.


I think a great many of us consider ourselves part of the 'unorganized' militia. It was clear to me, anyway, that you were referring to people who owned weapons and consider themselves a 'miltia' to be tactitards. perhaps even general gun owners who collect or prepare for shtf scenarios. 'tactitards' didn't seem directed necessarily at people engaged in active guerilla war or of the opinion that it was feasible against the U.S. military.

I don't know how long you've been using the 'honey' line, but at the time, i thought it was somewhat condescending. especially calling people who think, in their opinion, that a militia could face off in a guerilla war with the U.S. military 'delusional'.


Tactitard was referring to wanna be soldier types that often frequent the more official 'militia' types and are probably on several government watch lists. Besides, people make blanket comments about 'gun grabbers' all the time. Thats just as 'offensive' and 'bait-y' as calling people tactitards.

Also, condescending is a tone thats common on this forum. You use it all the time. Stop being so high and mighty.
Bailey Quinn, Nice ta meet ya! (Female Pronouns Please)
Also known as Harley
NS Stats are not used here.
<3 Alex's NS Wife <3
Normal is a setting on the dryer

User avatar
Luna Amore
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 15751
Founded: Antiquity
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Luna Amore » Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:56 pm

I can't say I see anything wrong with Honey personally.

Tactitard isn't kosher. You are on incredibly thin ice as it is RIG. If you don't watch how you phrase things, you'll lose this nation. I can guarantee it on the next offense.
Last edited by Luna Amore on Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Reploid Productions
Director of Moderation
 
Posts: 30511
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Reploid Productions » Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:49 am

Just to add a quick US$0.02 regarding "honey" and similar nicknames- if someone expresses annoyance with it and asks you to stop calling them that however, continuing to do so could be construed as flamebaiting.
Forum mod since May 8, 2003 -- Game mod since May 19, 2003 -- Nation turned 20 on March 23, 2023!
Sunset's DoGA FAQ - For those using DoGA to make their NS military and such.
One Stop Rules Shop -- Reppy's Sig Workshop -- Getting Help Page
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Char Aznable/Giant Meteor 2024! - Forcing humanity to move into space and progress whether we goddamn want to or not!


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Moderation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads