Advertisement
by Wallenburg » Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:38 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Don't threadjack.
by Bitely » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:02 pm
by Bitely » Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:30 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Afraid not - that's it. AFAIK, he does check the emails he receives, but is not able to reply to every one.
by Lord Ravenclaw » Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:12 pm
by Reploid Productions » Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:15 pm
Lord Ravenclaw wrote:I am strongly starting to get the sense of NS32.5 may end up being in the works. In the name of Flemingovia, I hope I've achieved my bucket list and are long gone by the time that happens.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Bitely » Tue Oct 06, 2015 9:38 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:Lord Ravenclaw wrote:I am strongly starting to get the sense of NS32.5 may end up being in the works. In the name of Flemingovia, I hope I've achieved my bucket list and are long gone by the time that happens.
Again, I wouldn't hold my breath on it. NS2 and Jolt left a pretty sour taste in everybody's mouths.
by Frisbeeteria » Tue Oct 06, 2015 9:47 pm
Bitely wrote:I wouldn't be looking to change the game just add funds for code improvements.
by The Stalker » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:02 pm
by Elke and Elba » Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:36 am
The Stalker wrote:You know I have been curious to where all the stamp money goes, since none of the staff get paid. I mean the site ran for years free just off the ads, but with the stamps, I know people who just pour money into that. Like a ton, hundreds of dollars week.
Who gets all that? I bet if people had a choice they would put their stamp money towards paying the technically staff at the very least.
Technical really should be paid, it's the only way the game could move forward. I mean the whole R/D summit changes from two years ago never happened and seems pretty unlikely it will anytime soon at this rate.
Ratateague wrote:NationStates seems to hate the Geneva Convention. I've lost count in how many times someone has tried to introduce something like it. Why they don't like it is a mystery to me. Probably a lot of jingoist wingnuts.
Ardchoille wrote:When you consider that (violet) once changed the colour of the whole game for one player ... you can understand how seriously NS takes its players.
by Bitely » Wed Oct 07, 2015 1:06 am
Frisbeeteria wrote:Bitely wrote:I wouldn't be looking to change the game just add funds for code improvements.
Somehow I imagine you've got a shopping list, and you would expect some quid pro quo for your 'donation'. We've managed to keep this site free for users for better than a dozen years, and the player-requested changes have always been carefully evaluated for game balance before being added.
Are you willing to make a public pledge that your donation would go towards whatever the Admin team wanted to spend it on, or are you holding out for something specific? If it's the former, then 'bravo to you'. If it's the latter, I'm not interested in standing by while we sell the game to anyone rich enough to buy the stuff they want.
by Stalker Queen » Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:14 am
Bitely wrote:Frisbeeteria wrote:Somehow I imagine you've got a shopping list, and you would expect some quid pro quo for your 'donation'. We've managed to keep this site free for users for better than a dozen years, and the player-requested changes have always been carefully evaluated for game balance before being added.
Are you willing to make a public pledge that your donation would go towards whatever the Admin team wanted to spend it on, or are you holding out for something specific? If it's the former, then 'bravo to you'. If it's the latter, I'm not interested in standing by while we sell the game to anyone rich enough to buy the stuff they want.
I'm interested in actually buying nationstates. but that isn't a bad idea. of course the money would have to go to adding more game enhancements.
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by The Novakian Empire » Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:17 am
Stalker Queen wrote:Bitely wrote:I'm interested in actually buying nationstates. but that isn't a bad idea. of course the money would have to go to adding more game enhancements.
Well if you're going that direction then everything's going to be overturned. Everything we've known is going to be destroyed and nothing will ever be the same again. You're going to upset an overwhelming majority just because you want the opportunity to purchase all the rights to a game you barely even know, compared to so many people who have been working hard at what they've got for many, many years. There are people who have been here for over a decade: do you seriously know this game better than those who have seen it develop and blossom for that long?
Do you seriously want us to believe that you're going to help everyone with your cash-lined pockets out of the good of your own heart? Do you seriously think you know best what the community which has been here for so many years wants after only being here for a matter of months, and having only experienced ONE tiny facet of NationStates: drafting World Assembly resolutions? Are you aware that there are roleplayers, raiders, defenders, imperialists, politicians, communities and so many other people besides just the minority that the World Assembly forum consists of?
Do you seriously think you'll be able to keep this game free in the state it is while paying hefty costs, not just in hosting but in so many other needs this game needs to exist in its present state periodically? Do you seriously think that your money's not going to run out to the point that you need to gradually charge more and more premiums to users: barely any of whom who have the wealth that you think they have?
Are you going to liquidate this game upon purchasing its rights just because a few dozen people pissed you off in your early days to spite possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't even know who you? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't care about what the World Assembly thinks? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people that could possibly accept you because they don't care what the World Assembly crowd think?
Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who have made the game as it is walk out the moment you start introducing premiums because you know absolutely nothing about how much hosting a website or any and all of its features actually cost? Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who considered NationStates their home for so much longer than you have even known of this game's existence walk out on you? Are you willing to lose that many customers just because you want to keep your own pockets lined? Are you willing to be even more scorned than you are the moment you introduce those premiums?
Are you ready to face the consequences of your actions?
Are you ready to purchase NationStates?
The moment you make your choice, there's no turning back. Hundreds of thousands of people will be affected by your actions, whether for better or for worse.
Choose wisely.
The moment you start making even the slightest change to NationStates is the moment I will leave forever in protest. And so will potentially hundreds of thousands of others. NationStates is ingenious in its simplicity as a text-based browser game and there are many people inclined to agree with me on this.
Don't. Do. This.
About Me White canadian male. Call me caleb. Pro: Palestine,Syrian Gov,Federal Quebec,Our lord and savior Cthulu,And bear grylls. Neutral: Meh Con: Israeli Government,erdogan,The PQ,Trump,ISIL,and Misandrists. | | [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] | [Normal] Head of Government: Prime Minister Thomas Schmidt Head of State: Emperor Erik Novakai Population: 48 Million Armed Forces: 1.2 Million Active, 4.8 Million Reserves | Nothing's really happening in novakia at the moment. | | Sigs 'n shit. "The Internet is dark and full of boners." -Daniel O' Brien WARNING:This nation represents my RL views. |
by The Blaatschapen » Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:20 am
Stalker Queen wrote:Bitely wrote:I'm interested in actually buying nationstates. but that isn't a bad idea. of course the money would have to go to adding more game enhancements.
Well if you're going that direction then everything's going to be overturned. Everything we've known is going to be destroyed and nothing will ever be the same again. You're going to upset an overwhelming majority just because you want the opportunity to purchase all the rights to a game you barely even know, compared to so many people who have been working hard at what they've got for many, many years. There are people who have been here for over a decade: do you seriously know this game better than those who have seen it develop and blossom for that long?
Do you seriously want us to believe that you're going to help everyone with your cash-lined pockets out of the good of your own heart? Do you seriously think you know best what the community which has been here for so many years wants after only being here for a matter of months, and having only experienced ONE tiny facet of NationStates: drafting World Assembly resolutions? Are you aware that there are roleplayers, raiders, defenders, imperialists, politicians, communities and so many other people besides just the minority that the World Assembly forum consists of?
Do you seriously think you'll be able to keep this game free in the state it is while paying hefty costs, not just in hosting but in so many other needs this game needs to exist in its present state periodically? Do you seriously think that your money's not going to run out to the point that you need to gradually charge more and more premiums to users: barely any of whom who have the wealth that you think they have?
Are you going to liquidate this game upon purchasing its rights just because a few dozen people pissed you off in your early days to spite possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't even know who you? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't care about what the World Assembly thinks? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people that could possibly accept you because they don't care what the World Assembly crowd think?
Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who have made the game as it is walk out the moment you start introducing premiums because you know absolutely nothing about how much hosting a website or any and all of its features actually cost? Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who considered NationStates their home for so much longer than you have even known of this game's existence walk out on you? Are you willing to lose that many customers just because you want to keep your own pockets lined? Are you willing to be even more scorned than you are the moment you introduce those premiums?
Are you ready to face the consequences of your actions?
Are you ready to purchase NationStates?
The moment you make your choice, there's no turning back. Hundreds of thousands of people will be affected by your actions, whether for better or for worse.
Choose wisely.
The moment you start making even the slightest change to NationStates is the moment I will leave forever in protest. And so will potentially hundreds of thousands of others. NationStates is ingenious in its simplicity as a text-based browser game and there are many people inclined to agree with me on this.
Don't. Do. This.
Reploid Productions wrote:While I obviously cannot speak for Max, it's worth noting that I seriously doubt he's interested in selling, especially after the debacle our ill-fated partnership with Jolt turned into.
by Stalker Queen » Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:27 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Do you think that Max will just sell the site willy-nilly for a few bucks? To quote Reppy:Reploid Productions wrote:While I obviously cannot speak for Max, it's worth noting that I seriously doubt he's interested in selling, especially after the debacle our ill-fated partnership with Jolt turned into.
I'm not saying that it won't happen, but I'll join Reploid in saying that chances are extremely slim, given the history.
Bitely wrote:Thanks for the reply. I'm not referring to the small tips one would give NS by buying stamps ect.
I was thinking of something more in the $XXXX range.
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by Land filled with People » Wed Oct 07, 2015 3:46 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Do you think that Max will just sell the site willy-nilly for a few bucks? To quote Reppy:Reploid Productions wrote:While I obviously cannot speak for Max, it's worth noting that I seriously doubt he's interested in selling, especially after the debacle our ill-fated partnership with Jolt turned into.
I'm not saying that it won't happen, but I'll join Reploid in saying that chances are extremely slim, given the history.
by Bitely » Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:09 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Stalker Queen wrote:Well if you're going that direction then everything's going to be overturned. Everything we've known is going to be destroyed and nothing will ever be the same again. You're going to upset an overwhelming majority just because you want the opportunity to purchase all the rights to a game you barely even know, compared to so many people who have been working hard at what they've got for many, many years. There are people who have been here for over a decade: do you seriously know this game better than those who have seen it develop and blossom for that long?
Do you seriously want us to believe that you're going to help everyone with your cash-lined pockets out of the good of your own heart? Do you seriously think you know best what the community which has been here for so many years wants after only being here for a matter of months, and having only experienced ONE tiny facet of NationStates: drafting World Assembly resolutions? Are you aware that there are roleplayers, raiders, defenders, imperialists, politicians, communities and so many other people besides just the minority that the World Assembly forum consists of?
Do you seriously think you'll be able to keep this game free in the state it is while paying hefty costs, not just in hosting but in so many other needs this game needs to exist in its present state periodically? Do you seriously think that your money's not going to run out to the point that you need to gradually charge more and more premiums to users: barely any of whom who have the wealth that you think they have?
Are you going to liquidate this game upon purchasing its rights just because a few dozen people pissed you off in your early days to spite possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't even know who you? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't care about what the World Assembly thinks? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people that could possibly accept you because they don't care what the World Assembly crowd think?
Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who have made the game as it is walk out the moment you start introducing premiums because you know absolutely nothing about how much hosting a website or any and all of its features actually cost? Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who considered NationStates their home for so much longer than you have even known of this game's existence walk out on you? Are you willing to lose that many customers just because you want to keep your own pockets lined? Are you willing to be even more scorned than you are the moment you introduce those premiums?
Are you ready to face the consequences of your actions?
Are you ready to purchase NationStates?
The moment you make your choice, there's no turning back. Hundreds of thousands of people will be affected by your actions, whether for better or for worse.
Choose wisely.
The moment you start making even the slightest change to NationStates is the moment I will leave forever in protest. And so will potentially hundreds of thousands of others. NationStates is ingenious in its simplicity as a text-based browser game and there are many people inclined to agree with me on this.
Don't. Do. This.
Do you think that Max will just sell the site willy-nilly for a few bucks? To quote Reppy:Reploid Productions wrote:While I obviously cannot speak for Max, it's worth noting that I seriously doubt he's interested in selling, especially after the debacle our ill-fated partnership with Jolt turned into.
I'm not saying that it won't happen, but I'll join Reploid in saying that chances are extremely slim, given the history.
by The Blaatschapen » Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:18 am
Bitely wrote:The Blaatschapen wrote:
Do you think that Max will just sell the site willy-nilly for a few bucks? To quote Reppy:
I'm not saying that it won't happen, but I'll join Reploid in saying that chances are extremely slim, given the history.
Your making a lot of assumptions; without knowing who I am. I've been playing NS for four years so that kinda debunks some of what you're saying. Second I work in the website development field so I know more about that then you assume.
by Stalker Queen » Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:21 am
Bitely wrote:Your making a lot of assumptions; without knowing who I am. I've been playing NS for four years so that kinda debunks some of what you're saying. Second I work in the website development field so I know more about that then you assume.
The Blaatschapen wrote:I think you're quoting the wrong person? I was not assuming anything about you?
Retired.Luna Amore wrote:You stalkin' too close.
by Bitely » Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:25 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Bitely wrote:Your making a lot of assumptions; without knowing who I am. I've been playing NS for four years so that kinda debunks some of what you're saying. Second I work in the website development field so I know more about that then you assume.
I think you're quoting the wrong person? I was not assuming anything about you?
by Tyrnica » Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:53 am
Stalker Queen wrote:Bitely wrote:I'm interested in actually buying nationstates. but that isn't a bad idea. of course the money would have to go to adding more game enhancements.
Well if you're going that direction then everything's going to be overturned. Everything we've known is going to be destroyed and nothing will ever be the same again. You're going to upset an overwhelming majority just because you want the opportunity to purchase all the rights to a game you barely even know, compared to so many people who have been working hard at what they've got for many, many years. There are people who have been here for over a decade: do you seriously know this game better than those who have seen it develop and blossom for that long?
Do you seriously want us to believe that you're going to help everyone with your cash-lined pockets out of the good of your own heart? Do you seriously think you know best what the community which has been here for so many years wants after only being here for a matter of months, and having only experienced ONE tiny facet of NationStates: drafting World Assembly resolutions? Are you aware that there are roleplayers, raiders, defenders, imperialists, politicians, communities and so many other people besides just the minority that the World Assembly forum consists of?
Do you seriously think you'll be able to keep this game free in the state it is while paying hefty costs, not just in hosting but in so many other needs this game needs to exist in its present state periodically? Do you seriously think that your money's not going to run out to the point that you need to gradually charge more and more premiums to users: barely any of whom who have the wealth that you think they have?
Are you going to liquidate this game upon purchasing its rights just because a few dozen people pissed you off in your early days to spite possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't even know who you? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't care about what the World Assembly thinks? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people that could possibly accept you because they don't care what the World Assembly crowd think?
Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who have made the game as it is walk out the moment you start introducing premiums because you know absolutely nothing about how much hosting a website or any and all of its features actually cost? Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who considered NationStates their home for so much longer than you have even known of this game's existence walk out on you? Are you willing to lose that many customers just because you want to keep your own pockets lined? Are you willing to be even more scorned than you are the moment you introduce those premiums?
Are you ready to face the consequences of your actions?
Are you ready to purchase NationStates?
The moment you make your choice, there's no turning back. Hundreds of thousands of people will be affected by your actions, whether for better or for worse.
Choose wisely.
The moment you start making even the slightest change to NationStates is the moment I will leave forever in protest. And so will potentially hundreds of thousands of others. NationStates is ingenious in its simplicity as a text-based browser game and there are many people inclined to agree with me on this.
Don't. Do. This.
Bitely wrote:Your making a lot of assumptions; without knowing who I am. I've been playing NS for four years so that kinda debunks some of what you're saying. Second I work in the website development field so I know more about that then you assume.
by Bitely » Wed Oct 07, 2015 5:01 am
Tyrnica wrote:Stalker Queen wrote:Well if you're going that direction then everything's going to be overturned. Everything we've known is going to be destroyed and nothing will ever be the same again. You're going to upset an overwhelming majority just because you want the opportunity to purchase all the rights to a game you barely even know, compared to so many people who have been working hard at what they've got for many, many years. There are people who have been here for over a decade: do you seriously know this game better than those who have seen it develop and blossom for that long?
Do you seriously want us to believe that you're going to help everyone with your cash-lined pockets out of the good of your own heart? Do you seriously think you know best what the community which has been here for so many years wants after only being here for a matter of months, and having only experienced ONE tiny facet of NationStates: drafting World Assembly resolutions? Are you aware that there are roleplayers, raiders, defenders, imperialists, politicians, communities and so many other people besides just the minority that the World Assembly forum consists of?
Do you seriously think you'll be able to keep this game free in the state it is while paying hefty costs, not just in hosting but in so many other needs this game needs to exist in its present state periodically? Do you seriously think that your money's not going to run out to the point that you need to gradually charge more and more premiums to users: barely any of whom who have the wealth that you think they have?
Are you going to liquidate this game upon purchasing its rights just because a few dozen people pissed you off in your early days to spite possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't even know who you? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people who don't care about what the World Assembly thinks? Possibly hundreds of thousands of people that could possibly accept you because they don't care what the World Assembly crowd think?
Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who have made the game as it is walk out the moment you start introducing premiums because you know absolutely nothing about how much hosting a website or any and all of its features actually cost? Are you going to watch possibly hundreds of thousands of people who considered NationStates their home for so much longer than you have even known of this game's existence walk out on you? Are you willing to lose that many customers just because you want to keep your own pockets lined? Are you willing to be even more scorned than you are the moment you introduce those premiums?
Are you ready to face the consequences of your actions?
Are you ready to purchase NationStates?
The moment you make your choice, there's no turning back. Hundreds of thousands of people will be affected by your actions, whether for better or for worse.
Choose wisely.
The moment you start making even the slightest change to NationStates is the moment I will leave forever in protest. And so will potentially hundreds of thousands of others. NationStates is ingenious in its simplicity as a text-based browser game and there are many people inclined to agree with me on this.
Don't. Do. This.
I couldn't agree more. Some would call this an exaggeration, but, honestly, I was slightly wary towards, and, for a small amount of time, against the Rift theme, even though I chose to switch over before it became the norm. I've barely been here for a year.
For those who have been here since, as the forum states so well, "Antiquity," I daresay that the slightest dislikable change will make them a shade more than "wary" or "against" whatever's been altered or implemented.Bitely wrote:Your making a lot of assumptions; without knowing who I am. I've been playing NS for four years so that kinda debunks some of what you're saying. Second I work in the website development field so I know more about that then you assume.
The only evidence we've seen so far of your work, online or otherwise, is your advertisements. Would you be willing to show us some of your previous projects and/or work, of a more substantial level?
by King Nephmir II » Wed Oct 07, 2015 5:10 am
Frisbeeteria wrote:If it's the latter, I'm not interested in standing by while we sell the game to anyone rich enough to buy the stuff they want.
by Bitely » Wed Oct 07, 2015 5:25 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dauchh Palki, Phydios, The Interlink Project, West Andes
Advertisement