by Stujenske » Tue Apr 21, 2015 8:59 pm
by Avakael » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:02 pm
by Great Brigantia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:07 pm
by Avakael » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:10 pm
Great Brigantia wrote:1. lol
2. The ban list auto-clears the nations at the beginning of the list when you hit the limit now. Were Stujenske paying better attention to when it was about to fill up, this wouldn't have happened.
by Great Brigantia » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:12 pm
Avakael wrote:Then why has the evidence that Killer Kitty was ever ejected and banned at all been removed from that nation's national happenings? Even if nations are automatically removed from the banlist, that much shouldn't happen.
by Reploid Productions » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:39 pm
Avakael wrote:Great Brigantia wrote:1. lol
2. The ban list auto-clears the nations at the beginning of the list when you hit the limit now. Were Stujenske paying better attention to when it was about to fill up, this wouldn't have happened.
Then why has the evidence that Killer Kitty was ever ejected and banned at all been removed from that nation's national happenings? Even if nations are automatically removed from the banlist, that much shouldn't happen.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Zemnaya Svoboda » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:40 pm
Avakael wrote:Great Brigantia wrote:1. lol
2. The ban list auto-clears the nations at the beginning of the list when you hit the limit now. Were Stujenske paying better attention to when it was about to fill up, this wouldn't have happened.
Then why has the evidence that Killer Kitty was ever ejected and banned at all been removed from that nation's national happenings? Even if nations are automatically removed from the banlist, that much shouldn't happen.
by Klaus Devestatorie » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:33 pm
I actually was. Seems like a moot matter now though. :|Zemnaya Svoboda wrote:Avakael wrote:Then why has the evidence that Killer Kitty was ever ejected and banned at all been removed from that nation's national happenings? Even if nations are automatically removed from the banlist, that much shouldn't happen.
Are you looking in NationStates++?
The NationStates++ archive of happenings appears to be imperfect. I've noticed a few bugs during recent events, including one I'd hypothesized existed before but hadn't actually run into. I intend to fix them at some point when I have more time.
by Zemnaya Svoboda » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:57 pm
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:I actually was. Seems like a moot matter now though. :|Zemnaya Svoboda wrote:
Are you looking in NationStates++?
The NationStates++ archive of happenings appears to be imperfect. I've noticed a few bugs during recent events, including one I'd hypothesized existed before but hadn't actually run into. I intend to fix them at some point when I have more time.
by United Steelworkers » Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:30 am
Reploid Productions wrote:And yeah, ban lists are capped (200 or 250, if memory serves,) and once full, a new ban bumps the oldest one off the list.
by Reploid Productions » Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:02 pm
United Steelworkers wrote:Reploid Productions wrote:And yeah, ban lists are capped (200 or 250, if memory serves,) and once full, a new ban bumps the oldest one off the list.
200, yes. Can you provide any insight into when this behavior began? Previously, running into the banlist cap would prevent a delegate from placing any more bans, so it was quite unexpected to see the silent removals that took place here. It worked to our advantage, of course, so I'm not complaining - just surprised.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Riemstagrad » Fri Apr 24, 2015 11:50 am
by SillyString » Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:46 am
Riemstagrad wrote:Imagine the puppet flooding if a full banlist removed the ban-hamers from delegates and founders...
by Ballotonia » Sun Apr 26, 2015 9:20 am
SillyString wrote:I'm pretty sure that silent banlist clears are relatively new behavior.. particularly since basically everyone was surprised (and either pleased or irritated) by discovering it during this coup.
by SillyString » Sun Apr 26, 2015 6:44 pm
Ballotonia wrote:As Reppy pointed out, and I am confirming now, that behavior has been in place for many many years. I thought I'd look up when exactly the 200 nation limit of the regional banlist was added to the game, but that happening predates the start of our code repository in 2004. The purge was automatic even then.
by Reploid Productions » Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:31 pm
SillyString wrote:Ballotonia wrote:As Reppy pointed out, and I am confirming now, that behavior has been in place for many many years. I thought I'd look up when exactly the 200 nation limit of the regional banlist was added to the game, but that happening predates the start of our code repository in 2004. The purge was automatic even then.
Thanks for confirming, Ballo. That's seriously astonishing - prior to the Lazarus coup, I'm not sure any of us knew that this happened at all.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ankuran, Ashlinla, Goosienaux, Hicroland Federation, Hulldom, Lower Slobbovia, Omashala, Patriums, The Baltic Confederation, The Plough Islands, The United British Kingdom
Advertisement