Game inconsistency

[Republic of Star Island]

I recently read the latest description of my nation, and there seems to be a major conflict between two bits of the description.

"Murderers frequently escape punishment by claiming they are performing honour killings" and "Crime is totally unknown, thanks to a capable police force and progressive social policies..."

Shouldn't the "capable police force" be catching these murderers and convicting them? I realize that the "honour killings" may have resulted from the way I handled the issue related to it, but this seems a little out of whack.

[Riemstagrad]

How capable your police force may be, if your laws permit honour killings, the honour killers will not be punished.

[Bears Armed]

Nations have been seen with "elections are banned, and voting is compulsory" before now...

[The Dark Star Republic]

I think the point is that these murderers aren't considered to be criminals, because honour killing is a valid legal defence in your country. Some nations have high drug use but low crime levels: this isn't an inconsistency, because in those nations drug use isn't a crime. It works the same for your nation: your issue choices seem to have legalised honour killings, and so the well funded police force won't pursue people who carry out such acts, because they don't consider them to be criminals.

[Nidos]

I recently read the latest description of my nation, and there seems to be a major conflict between two bits of the description.

"Murderers frequently escape punishment by claiming they are performing honour killings" and "Crime is totally unknown, thanks to a capable police force and progressive social policies..."

Shouldn't the "capable police force" be catching these murderers and convicting them? I realize that the "honour killings" may have resulted from the way I handled the issue related to it, but this seems a little out of whack.

Maybe it's saying that the "Capable police force" is catching the murderers but they escape punishment for committing honour killings... just a thought.

-IE

[Valrifell]

Nations have been seen with "elections are banned, and voting is compulsory" before now...

Those are what I like to call North Korean elections where there's only one candidate to vote.

[Kaboomlandia]

Nations have been seen with "elections are banned, and voting is compulsory" before now...

Those are what I like to call North Korean elections where there's only one candidate to vote.

Or Chinese elections.

"Here, you're totally allowed to vote, but only for the one guy that we picked, so there really is no difference."

[South Jarvis]

Those are what I like to call North Korean elections where there's only one candidate to vote.

Or Chinese elections.

"Here, you're totally allowed to vote, but only for the one guy that we picked, so there really is no difference."

Hey, it's not that bad...

'There are a small number of independent candidates for people's congress, particularly in neighborhoods of major cities'

See, progress!

[Jute]

Or Chinese elections.

"Here, you're totally allowed to vote, but only for the one guy that we picked, so there really is no difference."

Hey, it's not that bad...

'There are a small number of independent candidates for people's congress, particularly in neighborhoods of major cities'

See, progress!

Pre-approved by the party, if I remember correctly