by The Peoples Commonwealth of Unity » Sun Feb 15, 2015 11:52 pm
by Carolusborg » Sun Feb 15, 2015 11:54 pm
by Carolusborg » Sun Feb 15, 2015 11:59 pm
The Peoples Commonwealth of Unity wrote:So how do I delete the topic?
by Enfaru » Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:45 am
by Jute » Tue Feb 17, 2015 10:48 am
Enfaru wrote:This is surely a gameplay question...
Nevermind. There are descriptions available right here.
Factbooks are about your nation a bit like wikipedia. Bulletins are role-play basically, they're about how your government stands so, opinions rather than facts, check the categories for clarification. You can consider Bulletins to be present tense, things that are actually right now (or at the time of writing) true.
Accounts are definitely role-play but are usually stories that have happened in the past. So you might write a military account of onboard a ship which takes place either in the past or future. It differs from bulletins in that they are not typically what your people at large think or what your government thinks. So where as your news channel (bulletin) might report that Ships have been sighted moving to x your Account->Military would explore the relationships between characters on those ships and things that they encounter, which may or may not be public to the nation at large.
Finally there is Meta. Meta is a greek prefix meaning ''beyond'', we use it commonly to get beyond the fourth wall or describe things that would not be know the characters. I have no idea what the Gameplay category is for, but when it speaks about reference, I take it to mean things like why your factbook is arranged the way it is. What your characters are actually like rather than have you've suggested them to be. Meta->Reference can also be described for rules of how your nation should interact to remind you of their character and so on.
They are a little confusing and the descriptions really could be better but this is my understanding so far. (Yes I fully expect to be shot for putting dispatches in the wrong places).
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...
The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
"Boys and girls so happy, young and gay / Don't let false worldly joy carry your hearts away."
by BPSR » Wed Sep 02, 2015 5:58 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aserlandia, Ausruni, Bagong Timog Mindanao, Card Cleaver, Falkonne, Kzdor, Levantine-Balkos, New Yi Empire, Oceaniesia, Prowen, The Cheese Land, Tirifils, Tungstan
Advertisement