Reploid Productions wrote:[violet] wrote:The criterion most likely to be adjusted is the population limit, which may rise from 500M. We might move to a system where it's 100M or so for each inactive year. So after 5 years it's 500M and after 10 years it's 1B.
With soiled names, the majority were zapped for the name itself. There are many tens of thousands of them, and if they were released, mods would have to start all over, banning the same names again. Mods could manually mark some soiled names as available for reuse in extraordinary cases, though.
You'd think people would have run out of ways to try and sneak "penis" into account names by now.
I've seen some masterpieces, but the majority are fairly meh. Pen Island was only got in 2013 though, so there has to be a lot more out there, just waiting for someone smart enough to sneak it in. Also, I can see a few on our banlist which the mods haven't spotted yet, I think Feeders should get a double length ban list for the amount of new nations we have to gift to TRR.
So if there was a nation soiled that we wanted, would it have to be under a certain pop (and obviously not someone's main). Also, the person who lost the nation in the first place couldn't regain it from scratch right? Would the player who lost the nation in the first place retain a right of veto? If I accidentally messed up the rate limit, got my main deleted, I wouldn't want some stranger having my nation name.