Endorsement Suggestion

[Valdasia]

I have a suggestion for something to be added to a nation's page. Underneath where it says "Endorsements Received", there should be something that says "Endorsements Given" OR "Nations Endorsing" where it lists all the nations that the nation is endorsing.

[Holaloperho]

Good idea , I was think about this one to.

[Venetoland]

HEARTILY 2nd!

[Todd McCloud]

I wouldn't mind this. I'd be okay with it actually.

[Unibotian WA Mission]

Defenders try to hide in regions if they've missed update in the region they're liberating -- it occasionally works. But with this suggestion means we could be spotted if anyone one of us is spotted (unless we unendorsed and only endorsed ourselves a few seconds before the next update).

[Valdasia]

Defenders try to hide in regions if they've missed update in the region they're liberating -- it occasionally works. But with this suggestion means we could be spotted if anyone one of us is spotted (unless we unendorsed and only endorsed ourselves a few seconds before the next update).

Yeah, good point. This would damage the raiding-defending aspect of the game. Perhaps a nation's endorsed nations could be visible only to that nation? For example, Valdasia's endorsed nations could only be visible to Valdasia.

[Mousebumples]

Defenders try to hide in regions if they've missed update in the region they're liberating -- it occasionally works. But with this suggestion means we could be spotted if anyone one of us is spotted (unless we unendorsed and only endorsed ourselves a few seconds before the next update).

Yeah, good point. This would damage the raiding-defending aspect of the game. Perhaps a nation's endorsed nations could be visible only to that nation? For example, Valdasia's endorsed nations could only be visible to Valdasia.

And possibly the WA Delegate and/or Founder of that region?

I would think that there are enough "Defender-friendly" (or even Raider-friendly) regions out there that the R&D groups that missed an update could find a "safe haven" in which to chill without having their presence revealed to the other side ... ?

[Valdasia]

And possibly the WA Delegate and/or Founder of that region?

I would think that there are enough "Defender-friendly" (or even Raider-friendly) regions out there that the R&D groups that missed an update could find a "safe haven" in which to chill without having their presence revealed to the other side ... ?

Still, if the delegate could see this, they could easily spot a raider or defender. Which would be a bad thing.

[Mousebumples]

And possibly the WA Delegate and/or Founder of that region?

I would think that there are enough "Defender-friendly" (or even Raider-friendly) regions out there that the R&D groups that missed an update could find a "safe haven" in which to chill without having their presence revealed to the other side ... ?

Still, if the delegate could see this, they could easily spot a raider or defender. Which would be a bad thing.

But if a region which is in support of raiders or defenders is specifically chosen for that reason? Why would that be a bad thing? Would the WA Delegate DefenderFriend share the information with TargetRegion?

If I'm way off, please enlighten me. Why would a defender ally spotting defenders in their region be a "bad thing" ? Would they really "tell" on their allies?

[Valdasia]

Still, if the delegate could see this, they could easily spot a raider or defender. Which would be a bad thing.

But if a region which is in support of raiders or defenders is specifically chosen for that reason? Why would that be a bad thing? Would the WA Delegate DefenderFriend share the information with TargetRegion?

If I'm way off, please enlighten me. Why would a defender ally spotting defenders in their region be a "bad thing" ? Would they really "tell" on their allies?

You see, if raiders/defenders invaded a region not in support of them, this could cause problems for the attacking party.

[Mousebumples]

But if a region which is in support of raiders or defenders is specifically chosen for that reason? Why would that be a bad thing? Would the WA Delegate DefenderFriend share the information with TargetRegion?

If I'm way off, please enlighten me. Why would a defender ally spotting defenders in their region be a "bad thing" ? Would they really "tell" on their allies?

You see, if raiders/defenders invaded a region not in support of them, this could cause problems for the attacking party.

Yes, but I believe the problem raised above was for when they are "too late" and miss the update in the target region. As such, they try to fly under the radar in another region.

That was what my query (what's the issue with that having if allied regions are targeted as "havens" or hiding places) was about.