by Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf » Wed Jun 03, 2015 6:55 pm
by Outer Sparta » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:26 pm
by Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:36 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:So, why 300, then?
by Phydios » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:38 pm
If you claim to be religious but don’t control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and your religion is worthless. Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you. | Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’James 1:26-27, Matthew 7:21-23
by Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:40 pm
Phydios wrote:You made a mistake in option 2's effect. Saying "I would rather die than continue leading" means that you want to stop leading. That's obviously not what you meant to say. My suggestion is "@@LEADER@@ has been quoted saying that they would rather die than stop leading."
by Sanctaria » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:51 pm
by Neo-Chicago » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:52 pm
by Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:57 pm
Neo-Chicago wrote:Not sure if you're asking for suggestions, but I've got one:
[option]"You know..." says a shifty looking man dressed exactly as you are. "I don't think this nation could survive losing a leader as great as you. How about I take the reins for a while, while you just relax?"
[effect]@@LEADER@@ has been committed to a mental hospital after a drastic shift in their personality.
Sanctaria wrote:Not sure this is feasible. One part of issues is that you're perpetually leader.
If you want to change your leader, change it in your settings.
by Luna Amore » Wed Jun 03, 2015 8:59 pm
by Unsuspecting User » Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:06 pm
Luna Amore wrote:The major hurdles with this draft:
1. It's too meta for lack of a better word. I have no problem with it only being valid for nations who have addressed > x amount of issues, but the issue text shouldn't directly refer to it.
2. Two of your options result in @@LEADER@@ resigning/losing the position. I agree with Sanc, those aren't viable. You, the leader, never lose your position.
3. The dilemma doesn't make much sense. "You've solved so many problems -> man this job is a drag, you should resign." Who gets bummed out that they are making a difference?
Personally, I don't see this one going anywhere. Revising it to avoid the resigning @@LEADER@@ problem is more than likely going to steer it into the same territory as #404. I don't see the need for another issue like that.
by Golgothastan » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:52 pm
by Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf » Thu Jun 04, 2015 5:56 pm
Unsuspecting User wrote:Luna Amore wrote:The major hurdles with this draft:
1. It's too meta for lack of a better word. I have no problem with it only being valid for nations who have addressed > x amount of issues, but the issue text shouldn't directly refer to it.
2. Two of your options result in @@LEADER@@ resigning/losing the position. I agree with Sanc, those aren't viable. You, the leader, never lose your position.
3. The dilemma doesn't make much sense. "You've solved so many problems -> man this job is a drag, you should resign." Who gets bummed out that they are making a difference?
Personally, I don't see this one going anywhere. Revising it to avoid the resigning @@LEADER@@ problem is more than likely going to steer it into the same territory as #404. I don't see the need for another issue like that.
There was an issue where @@LEADER@@ was almost killed, so what if it's like @@LEADER@@ attempts to resign, almost, but doesn't? Also, maybe the nation should have low happiness, which could make some sense for the @@LEADER@@ to be depressed with their job.
by Sanctaria » Thu Jun 04, 2015 5:58 pm
Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf wrote:Unsuspecting User wrote:There was an issue where @@LEADER@@ was almost killed, so what if it's like @@LEADER@@ attempts to resign, almost, but doesn't? Also, maybe the nation should have low happiness, which could make some sense for the @@LEADER@@ to be depressed with their job.
This makes more sense. I'm going to remake the issue. It will have a different title but still be about you wanting to resign. Also, Golg, my issues I draft aren't special. I just try bringing in the less looked things that people might not consider to be not important. In all reality, if a leader was to resign, which no issue even talks about for my knowledge, it would be a national crisis. I just think it's safer to draft something that's happened in the past rather than only deal with current events for issues.
by Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf » Thu Jun 04, 2015 6:13 pm
Sanctaria wrote:Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf wrote:
This makes more sense. I'm going to remake the issue. It will have a different title but still be about you wanting to resign. Also, Golg, my issues I draft aren't special. I just try bringing in the less looked things that people might not consider to be not important. In all reality, if a leader was to resign, which no issue even talks about for my knowledge, it would be a national crisis. I just think it's safer to draft something that's happened in the past rather than only deal with current events for issues.
That "remaking" wouldn't be any better.
You've had three editors tell you to drop the issue. Even if you don't, and continue to work on it, I doubt any of us will accept it. Don't waste your time.
by Jute » Fri Jun 05, 2015 10:41 am
Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf wrote:Sanctaria wrote:That "remaking" wouldn't be any better.
You've had three editors tell you to drop the issue. Even if you don't, and continue to work on it, I doubt any of us will accept it. Don't waste your time.
okay. I'll abandon it. I'll think of something more people would find discuss-able. I need to gather my thoughts.
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...
The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
"Boys and girls so happy, young and gay / Don't let false worldly joy carry your hearts away."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement