HELP:We Who Are About To Die Would Rather Go Home

[Westgard]

An old supporter of yours has recently passed on, leaving a quite sizeable plot of land to you in his will - but only under a rather unusual condition: that the site be developed into a colosseum for hosting gladiatorial fights and other bloody spectacles.
The Debate

1. "Yes, yes!" cries Tobias Dubois, waving a wooden sword enthusiastically. "You've gotta do this, man! Gladiator fights are like the ultimate in spectator sports! And it doesn't just have to be people! We could pit man against Red Falcon! Blade against claw! Nothing to their names but their wits and their stamina! You'd have to pay people a lot to risk their lives doing this but I bet you'd earn a whole lot more from merchandise and wagers and stuff!"


2. "That's just sick," says Stan Silk, president of the Kill Violence Now Association. "I don't believe you'd find anyone willing to watch actual people tearing each other apart. It's savage and horrible! It's even worse than boxing! Violent sports should be outlawed for the sake of this country's moral integrity. I'm sorry, I've got to go - I'm ashamed you're even considering this."


3. "Actually, we could use this to our advantage," whispers Chief of Police, Virginia Smith. "Why not just force convicted criminals to fight for the amusement of the public? They'll be paying for their crimes, contributing to society, and totally freeing us of having to build jails to throw their useless hides in!"

Does anyone know what these issues cause? I'm thinking of doing 1 or 3 specifically, but not sure of the effects.

[Westgard]

Nobody gotten this issue before or know the effects?

[Perrytopia]

Nobody gotten this issue before or know the effects?

I went with 1, and it rose civil rights by 1%, I believe. The description is something along the lines of "In @@NAME@@, A sport isn't considered a sport unless there are decapitations" I hope this helps

[Westgard]

Nobody gotten this issue before or know the effects?

I went with 1, and it rose civil rights by 1%, I believe. The description is something along the lines of "In @@NAME@@, A sport isn't considered a sport unless there are decapitations" I hope this helps

Yea it does thanks. I wouldn't have thought "allowing" people to participate in fights to the death would count as a civil right, haha, since this site tends to view leftist issues like equality as "civil rights" usually. I'm tempted by option 3, but I can't resist a boost to civil rights.

[Perrytopia]

I went with 1, and it rose civil rights by 1%, I believe. The description is something along the lines of "In @@NAME@@, A sport isn't considered a sport unless there are decapitations" I hope this helps

Yea it does thanks. I wouldn't have thought "allowing" people to participate in fights to the death would count as a civil right, haha, since this site tends to view leftist issues like equality as "civil rights" usually. I'm tempted by option 3, but I can't resist a boost to civil rights.

Aparently the boost in civil rights comes from the fact that your nation isn't forcing people to participate, and that these battles allows your citizens to have a greater degree of control over their own lives ( and make an large amount of cash to boot )