by Archeu-Gilneas » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:11 pm
☩ Join the bulwark of united Christianity on NationStates! Learn more here and here!☩Founder of the first and second Alliance of Protestant Nations
Founder of the Biblical Assembly
Founder of the Gilnean Defense Coalition
My writings on theology and politics.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:17 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Archeu-Gilneas » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:20 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Maybe if you stop running around shouting conspiracy theories (or insults?) about secularists running their region (what's the major issue here anyways?), you could both just go your own, separate, happy ways?
☩ Join the bulwark of united Christianity on NationStates! Learn more here and here!☩Founder of the first and second Alliance of Protestant Nations
Founder of the Biblical Assembly
Founder of the Gilnean Defense Coalition
My writings on theology and politics.
by Archeu-Gilneas » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:23 pm
Ridersyl wrote:Who's the 'We'? Do you have a mouse in your pocket, or has this actually been discussed through telegram?
☩ Join the bulwark of united Christianity on NationStates! Learn more here and here!☩Founder of the first and second Alliance of Protestant Nations
Founder of the Biblical Assembly
Founder of the Gilnean Defense Coalition
My writings on theology and politics.
by The State of Deseret » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:24 pm
Archeu-Gilneas wrote:After the deletion of A&B the Alliance of Protestant Nations has split into many different groups. I now accept a need for coexistence.
Discuss it here.
by Archeu-Gilneas » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:26 pm
☩ Join the bulwark of united Christianity on NationStates! Learn more here and here!☩Founder of the first and second Alliance of Protestant Nations
Founder of the Biblical Assembly
Founder of the Gilnean Defense Coalition
My writings on theology and politics.
by Aravea » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:41 pm
Archeu-Gilneas wrote:1. Un-ban each other from our regions
2. Establish embassies with each other
3. Create an interregional alliance
4. Determine where each region stands on various issues
5. Investigate leaders in all regions to see if my assertions that they are secularists actually hold up.
by Archeu-Gilneas » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:43 pm
☩ Join the bulwark of united Christianity on NationStates! Learn more here and here!☩Founder of the first and second Alliance of Protestant Nations
Founder of the Biblical Assembly
Founder of the Gilnean Defense Coalition
My writings on theology and politics.
by Jumalariik » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:46 pm
Archeu-Gilneas wrote:Yes, hence the creation of a tribunal to investigate the leaders of all Protestant regions.
It would be led by:
Me
Hank
Western-Ukraine
Gilneas
Aravea
Jumalariik
Land of Oasis
by Aravea » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:46 pm
Archeu-Gilneas wrote:Yes, hence the creation of a tribunal to investigate the leaders of all Protestant regions.
It would be led by:
Me
Hank
Western-Ukraine
Gilneas
Aravea
Jumalariik
Land of Oasis
by Archeu-Gilneas » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:47 pm
☩ Join the bulwark of united Christianity on NationStates! Learn more here and here!☩Founder of the first and second Alliance of Protestant Nations
Founder of the Biblical Assembly
Founder of the Gilnean Defense Coalition
My writings on theology and politics.
by Jumalariik » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:48 pm
Aravea wrote:Archeu-Gilneas wrote:Yes, hence the creation of a tribunal to investigate the leaders of all Protestant regions.
It would be led by:
Me
Hank
Western-Ukraine
Gilneas
Aravea
Jumalariik
Land of Oasis
Tell my why is there a need for Gilneas to be on the tribunal? Given his less than impeccable record is he really qualified to be on this hypothetical tribunal? In addition it seems as if this proposal you put forward is more or less dominated by those who are sympathetic to you or your ideals.
by Jumalariik » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:49 pm
Deian salazar wrote:Jumalariik wrote:None of your terms are worth while. If this is your terms, a tribunal against us, us unbanning you, with nothing in return, I have no interest in being involved.
The only terms that I personally would accept would be these:
1. Both regions adopt a democratic elders system.
2. Both regions move all members to The Christian Republic
3. We have a military alliance and take other regions.
Any other terms are awful and will not be supported by me.
I still get to be Raiding/Defending Warlord(Tactician) right?
by Rifty » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:50 pm
by Aravea » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:52 pm
Jumalariik wrote:Aravea wrote:
Tell my why is there a need for Gilneas to be on the tribunal? Given his less than impeccable record is he really qualified to be on this hypothetical tribunal? In addition it seems as if this proposal you put forward is more or less dominated by those who are sympathetic to you or your ideals.
Agreed. What would be better is that each faction can pick 5 negotiators.
by Jumalariik » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:52 pm
Archeu-Gilneas wrote:This is a matter of uniting the regions in diplomacy, not individual compromise on doctrinal issues. Our region opposes furry stuff but yours clearly do not. That is no reason for us not to be allied.
I still object to the governance of your region, but I understand - I accept - that peaceable relations and alliance is necessary.
by Jumalariik » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:53 pm
by Leila Malkal » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:55 pm
by Jumalariik » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:55 pm
by Rifty » Sun Dec 21, 2014 7:56 pm
Aravea wrote:Jumalariik wrote:Agreed. What would be better is that each faction can pick 5 negotiators.
To be honest, the best thing at this point is to drop this tribunal nonsense as all it will do is create further discord. Honestly, all this whole tribunal would boil down to is a glorified witch hunt for supposed secularists. Oh and that is without even mentioning the ever so convenient placement of nations that are known to have ties to Archeuland upon the tribunal.
by Jumalariik » Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:00 pm
Rifty wrote:Aravea wrote:
To be honest, the best thing at this point is to drop this tribunal nonsense as all it will do is create further discord. Honestly, all this whole tribunal would boil down to is a glorified witch hunt for supposed secularists. Oh and that is without even mentioning the ever so convenient placement of nations that are known to have ties to Archeuland upon the tribunal.
I ain't religious yet im on it...so...uh...Yeah
by Archeu-Gilneas » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:49 am
☩ Join the bulwark of united Christianity on NationStates! Learn more here and here!☩Founder of the first and second Alliance of Protestant Nations
Founder of the Biblical Assembly
Founder of the Gilnean Defense Coalition
My writings on theology and politics.
by Archeu-Gilneas » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:20 am
☩ Join the bulwark of united Christianity on NationStates! Learn more here and here!☩Founder of the first and second Alliance of Protestant Nations
Founder of the Biblical Assembly
Founder of the Gilnean Defense Coalition
My writings on theology and politics.
by Rifty » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:58 am
Archeu-Gilneas wrote:We could also discuss the Eternal Knights situation, and whether we should partner with them or not. You all know my standpoint on the new Eternal Knights leader (I stand with Nephmir only) so we should take that into account.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Free Social Conservatives, Wickedness
Advertisement