Advertisement
by Apulita » Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:44 pm
by Ocaeania » Sun Apr 03, 2016 10:56 pm
by Apulita » Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:20 am
Ocaeania wrote:Hey! I'm somewhat of a structural theorist here on NS and the issue of population retainment problems in Warzones was recently brought to my attention. I thought it might be interesting to take a look and see if I didn't have an idea or two as to how it might be fixed.
by Warzone Codger » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:39 am
by Tim Stark » Mon Apr 04, 2016 10:01 am
Warzone Codger wrote:But there's news though!
Airspace thought it was smart and didn't listen to me when I told them to start backing The Salaxalans over Fiermont.
They vastly underestimated my (and many others) puppet army, so Salax took the 5th spot from Fiermont...
I always have Airspace's best interests at heart, even when they don't know it.
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Ocaeania » Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:01 am
by New Perotasoa » Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:46 am
Ocaeania wrote:How would you feel about turning the Warzones back into a warzone? with proper preparations, of course. Defense systems set up and what not. I feel as though this would be more effective than any other attempts to revitalize. I've got a few half-baked plans floating around in my head since I started thinking about it this morning. I think we could really do something with this.
by Apulita » Mon Apr 04, 2016 8:57 pm
Ocaeania wrote:How would you feel about turning the Warzones back into a warzone? with proper preparations, of course. Defense systems set up and what not. I feel as though this would be more effective than any other attempts to revitalize. I've got a few half-baked plans floating around in my head since I started thinking about it this morning. I think we could really do something with this.
by Malviet » Wed Apr 06, 2016 12:54 am
Warzone Codger wrote:But there's news though!
Airspace thought it was smart and didn't listen to me when I told them to start backing The Salaxalans over Fiermont.
They vastly underestimated my (and many others) puppet army, so Salax took the 5th spot from Fiermont...
I always have Airspace's best interests at heart, even when they don't know it.
by Ocaeania » Wed Apr 06, 2016 2:14 am
by Malviet » Wed Apr 06, 2016 6:33 am
Apulita wrote:Ocaeania wrote:How would you feel about turning the Warzones back into a warzone? with proper preparations, of course. Defense systems set up and what not. I feel as though this would be more effective than any other attempts to revitalize. I've got a few half-baked plans floating around in my head since I started thinking about it this morning. I think we could really do something with this.
As mentioned before, you're welcome to contact me at any point with your concepts and possible implementation.
by Gatito » Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:39 am
Ocaeania wrote:How would you feel about turning the Warzones back into a warzone? with proper preparations, of course. Defense systems set up and what not. I feel as though this would be more effective than any other attempts to revitalize. I've got a few half-baked plans floating around in my head since I started thinking about it this morning. I think we could really do something with this.
by North Campbell Nation » Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:10 am
Gatito wrote:Ocaeania wrote:How would you feel about turning the Warzones back into a warzone? with proper preparations, of course. Defense systems set up and what not. I feel as though this would be more effective than any other attempts to revitalize. I've got a few half-baked plans floating around in my head since I started thinking about it this morning. I think we could really do something with this.
Throughout my time here I have observed that the Warzones have deviated from their origins purpose. Really, I don't believe that there should even be native governments in them. They should be a place for regions to compete for control over, not one for people to establish homes in. We need to make the Warzones into actual Warzones.
by Etoarmaapitm » Wed Apr 06, 2016 2:30 pm
by Gatito » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:02 pm
Etoarmaapitm wrote:I would also like to note that the existence of our governments and communities do add more value to go after Warzones than without them...for the most part...
by Ocaeania » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:37 pm
by District XIV » Wed Apr 06, 2016 4:38 pm
Ocaeania wrote:Hey, do the leaders of their respective regions have Skype/access to discordapp.com? I think it's be best if we were all able to discuss in a more private area.
by Apulita » Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:44 pm
Gatito wrote:Etoarmaapitm wrote:I would also like to note that the existence of our governments and communities do add more value to go after Warzones than without them...for the most part...
It just seems odd to me that stability has been reached in regions that were seemingly created with the intention of being unstable. The problem is that there's nothing to spur said instability.
Ocaeania wrote:Hey, do the leaders of their respective regions have Skype/access to discordapp.com? I think it's be best if we were all able to discuss in a more private area.
by Malviet » Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:57 am
Ocaeania wrote:Hey, do the leaders of their respective regions have Skype/access to discordapp.com? I think it's be best if we were all able to discuss in a more private area.
by Malviet » Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:57 am
by Etoarmaapitm » Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:46 pm
by Warzone Codger » Fri Apr 08, 2016 7:15 am
North Campbell Nation wrote:The way I see it, it's really just a matter of mechanical incentives. Though I'd be interested in hearing potential "solutions".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dharmasya
Advertisement