You didn't read the guest book did you?
http://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=310022
For Your Information
Warzone Vacation Resort (henceforth referred to as WZV Resort[s]) is not a Warzone, however raids are not frowned upon.
Advertisement
by The Isles of Random » Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:56 am
For Your Information
Warzone Vacation Resort (henceforth referred to as WZV Resort[s]) is not a Warzone, however raids are not frowned upon.
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by Rifty » Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:05 am
The Isles of Random wrote:Rifty wrote:Since it's a warzone why didn't you remove executive controls from the founder? O.o
You didn't read the guest book did you?
http://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=310022For Your Information
Warzone Vacation Resort (henceforth referred to as WZV Resort[s]) is not a Warzone, however raids are not frowned upon.
by The Isles of Random » Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:15 am
NoblePhnx wrote:Won't it be difficult to keep track of all the taggers and guests who visit?
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by Shadoke » Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:44 am
Rifty wrote:The Isles of Random wrote:You didn't read the guest book did you?
http://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=310022
Of course I didn't - had funner things to do
by Rifty » Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:05 am
by Frederick William II » Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:17 am
Pan-Warzone Military pactPurpose
The aim of this pact is to establish a unified army among all regions recognised as a "native Warzone community." This is not to serve as a military used for any allied regions missions unless provided with aJjust cause. This pact is not a replacement to the UWR. This pact once signed must be upheld for an indefinite period of time or at which point when 1/2 of the native Warzone delegates decide they do not wish for it to continue. It will include:» Definition of a "native Warzone community"
» Terms of entry
» Expectations of signed Warzones
» Running of the PactDefinition of a "native Warzone community"
1. A native Warzone community must:1.1.
Be in control of the delegacy for two months of a three month period of time or two months consistentlyBe a native government that legally came to power
1.2.Retain a minimum of five endorsements on the delegate
1.3. Recognize all other Warzones part of this pact as "Native"
1.4. Uphold embassies with all Warzones regardless of current Foreign Affairs
2. A native Warzone community must not:2.1. Be an occupation by a foreign military
2.2. Have more foreign military endorsements thean native ones, unless said foreign military endorsements are being used to protect the Warzone during an attack1
2.3. Close embassies with any WarzoneTerms of entry
1. Must meet the requirements to be a "native Warzone community"
2. Have their delegate sign for the entire region3. Recognize all other Warzones part of this pact as "native Warzone community"This is a requirement to be a native Warzone community, which is covered in #2.4. Must open embassies with The Association of ImperialismExpectations of signed Warzones
1. To uphold their own military if the Delegate has more than five endorsements2. Allow the military to be commanded by the "Protector of Native Warzone Communities" in times of need
3. Have an individual military commander for their specific Warzone's militaryand to advise the "Protector of Native Warzone Communities"
4. Uphold embassies withboth The Association of Imperialism andall other Warzones
5. Not take military action against any other Warzone
6. Avoid causing inter-regional disputes which may lead toMmilitary action taken againstsaid Warzoneany other WarzoneRunning of the Pact
1. Any nation may nominate themselves to be the "Protector of Native Warzone Communities"Each Warzone that is able to have a military is required to use that military to protect another signatory Warzone that has come under attack2. The "Protector of Native Warzone Communities" has overuling control of the Pan-Warzone MilitaryIf the military of a Warzone is engaged in military operations that do not include defending another Warzone, then the military has three days to conclude those military operations before it must come to the aid of the Warzone under attack3. The "Protector of Native Warzone Communities" is voted upon out of the nominees with each Warzone receiving one vote
4. The "Protector of Native Warzone Communities" must not use the Pan-Warzone Military for any military events other then those in the best interests of all the "native Warzone communities"5. The movement of endorsements from region to region to ensure safety for all
6. The Pan-Warzone Military must be used to reclaim all Warzones displaced by foreign forcesSignatures
Prophet of The Association of Imperialism: Rifty2
Delegate of Warzone Africa:
Delegate of Warzone Airship:
Delegate of Warzone Asia:
Delegate of Warzone Australia:
Delegate of Warzone Europe:
Delegate of Warzone Sandbox:
by The Isles of Random » Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:01 am
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by Rifty » Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:08 am
The Isles of Random wrote:To expand upon the issue of AOI involvement, I would liken the AOI to your favorite store. We like them, we enjoy their company (unless it gets uncomfortable), and we hold them in high regard. But sometimes signing up for a membership or credit card isn't always the best thing.
by The Isles of Random » Fri Dec 12, 2014 11:35 am
Rifty wrote:The Isles of Random wrote:To expand upon the issue of AOI involvement, I would liken the AOI to your favorite store. We like them, we enjoy their company (unless it gets uncomfortable), and we hold them in high regard. But sometimes signing up for a membership or credit card isn't always the best thing.
Well as I stated this wasn't to futher my own power but to allow us to either have you guys become all allied or have it so we can hit the Warzones without the worry of you guys not being able to rebuild. I shall leave you all to finish this yourself but I would like a mention in it's writing if that's not too much to ask.
WZEU and WZAS have our assurance of AoI free delegacy. From here on out all others do not. Guess that means it's time to remove "Watcher" from my Signature, huh? ^_~
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by Fiddlalia » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:04 pm
Rifty wrote:The Isles of Random wrote:To expand upon the issue of AOI involvement, I would liken the AOI to your favorite store. We like them, we enjoy their company (unless it gets uncomfortable), and we hold them in high regard. But sometimes signing up for a membership or credit card isn't always the best thing.
Well as I stated this wasn't to futher my own power but to allow us to either have you guys become all allied or have it so we can hit the Warzones without the worry of you guys not being able to rebuild. I shall leave you all to finish this yourself but I would like a mention in it's writing if that's not too much to ask.
WZEU and WZAS have our assurance of AoI free delegacy. From here on out all others do not. Guess that means it's time to remove "Watcher" from my Signature, huh? ^_~
by Rifty » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:11 pm
Fiddlalia wrote:Rifty wrote:Well as I stated this wasn't to futher my own power but to allow us to either have you guys become all allied or have it so we can hit the Warzones without the worry of you guys not being able to rebuild. I shall leave you all to finish this yourself but I would like a mention in it's writing if that's not too much to ask.
WZEU and WZAS have our assurance of AoI free delegacy. From here on out all others do not. Guess that means it's time to remove "Watcher" from my Signature, huh? ^_~
I fully understand that. My main concern is with other groups hating is when you get involved. As an example, TEK has helped WZAI a lot, and it seems that cooperation with AoI would lead to conflict.
by Fiddlalia » Fri Dec 12, 2014 3:20 pm
Rifty wrote:Fiddlalia wrote:I fully understand that. My main concern is with other groups hating is when you get involved. As an example, TEK has helped WZAI a lot, and it seems that cooperation with AoI would lead to conflict.
Any conflict in WZEU? Any conflict in WZAS? Admittedly WZAS was raided a few weeks back but that had nothing to do with our presence - however we made sure they had the region back by the next update. Look at the regions we're allied with and look at how they are faring.
TEK has also gone under new leadership which supports AoI a great deal - Going as far as offering an alliance.
Being blunt - As much as allying with us may increase your chances of being raided by a very small chance; Having us as allies also makes your region a lot more safe and a transition from being raided to being back in the delegate seat a hell of a lot easier.
Also since the announcement of being Independents with a Raider leaning rather then straight up raiders - Makes us even less of a region to dislike. We've helped liberate APN from raiders with the help of defenders. Foreign relations on our part are getting a hell of a lot better.
by The Isles of Random » Mon Dec 15, 2014 6:18 am
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by Siberian Districts » Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:07 am
The Isles of Random wrote:So... When is the next Warzone Weekly coming out?
There has to be a good lump on WZAU. Raids, TWP, and New Zealandia, boy it's been busy. And in the end, WZAU sports the WFE I put up back when I was delegate (excluding the top line and the imperialism comment).
by Rifty » Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:12 am
Siberian Districts wrote:The Isles of Random wrote:So... When is the next Warzone Weekly coming out?
There has to be a good lump on WZAU. Raids, TWP, and New Zealandia, boy it's been busy. And in the end, WZAU sports the WFE I put up back when I was delegate (excluding the top line and the imperialism comment).
Ah, yes.
I wanted to establish Warzone embassies with TWP, and rather than just ask like any normal person, I lead a quick training mission.
by Khronion » Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:05 am
by The Isles of Random » Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:47 pm
Khronion wrote:Isles, wanna finish the issue up? RL picked up quite suddenly, so this week will probably not see much of me outside of a few sporadic forum posts.
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by The Isles of Random » Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:28 pm
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by Rifty » Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:32 pm
The Isles of Random wrote:I saw that some of the Warzones have applied for a spot in the NS world fair.
How does that work? And what are we as the Warzones doing there?
by Arekrya » Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:45 pm
The Isles of Random wrote:I saw that some of the Warzones have applied for a spot in the NS world fair.
How does that work? And what are we as the Warzones doing there?
by The Isles of Random » Thu Dec 18, 2014 4:47 pm
Rifty wrote:The Isles of Random wrote:I saw that some of the Warzones have applied for a spot in the NS world fair.
How does that work? And what are we as the Warzones doing there?
Yeah I saw that - Id be a bit ticked off as a Warzone if I happened to grouped alongside other Warzones; Especially if we weren't part of the UWR.
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:17 am
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by The Isles of Random » Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:59 am
We Are Not the NSA wrote:If the real world was like NS, then Belgium could have just password protected itself, or simply moved somewhere else, away from Germany.
by Ancian » Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:32 pm
The Isles of Random wrote:Rifty wrote:Yeah I saw that - Id be a bit ticked off as a Warzone if I happened to grouped alongside other Warzones; Especially if we weren't part of the UWR.
Now now, no one said that the UWR would be presented or that all the Warzones are getting clumped into a single group. I imagine that the Warzones would get, say, a corner of the fairgrounds. As the initial application goes, WZAF, WZAI, and WZEU were the three mentioned. I'm not sure what WZEU is doing with it though.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement