Glen-Rhodes wrote:Additionally, unlike you or Unibot, I have never claimed to believe in a universal concept of GCR/regional protection from external interference.
At least we have on record the opposite of what's been assumed and argued in TSP for years. A little vindication is always nice.
On the contrary, I have always been very frank that I base my views not on universal concepts but on my regions' alliances and relations.
This was as true during the alliance between TNI and TSP as it is now.
If we believed a universal concept of GCR protection, we would not never have been at war with the FRA given its inclusion of TRR (and now Lazarus).
Glen-Rhodes wrote:I don't really care about your harping over Lazarus, especially when it makes it painfully obvious that you're only doing it to score points against Unibot. Your position is much weaker when you don't believe GCR sovereignty is worth anything.
It is perfectly obvious that Cormac revealed this information to score points against Belschaft, yet you care about this incident.
The real reason you are avoiding answering me is because in reality the same defences apply in this situation as apply in the situation as for Feux's conversations in Lazarus, but whereas you condemn anyone who invokes as a 'downright joke' you do not condemn Unibot for defending Feux.
The reason I care about Lazarus is because it was allied to TNI and the LKE at the time of the incident - not to mention the scurrilous allegations levied by the NPO and their supporters against the 'Ondersphere' while they carried out their purge - so there is a reason for us to be involved in it. However, that does not mean we should be equally concerned with what happens in regions with which we have no connection. It is the relationships which exist between regions, not external universal concepts that apply to all regions, which determine the policies of regions independent of, inter alia, defender idealism.