The fact that we released our documents prior to publication of this tabloid article or knowledge of its existence does lend credence to what we're saying, since the official documents released differ from that which is quoted in the article.
Or because the documents I released are at least a week old possibly two? I doubt that there has been no discussion since I received this information. There is no dispute that the documents released by you today, are different. I dispute the fact that this was a well executed plan, releasing false information. Given that yourself, Gaspo and others, have all agreed that this was the case.
I presume you all knew who was given the false information if you expected them to leak it? So obviously you were all able to discuss the real document in secret, away from the people on the committee? Or are you completely sure that none of them leaked it? Trusting of the individuals on the committee, but not of others? If you didn't trust them, why include them in the meeting to start with?
I look forward to seeing them put to task about the release then. Which is something that will have to be handled with great diplomatic care, given who has released it.