Space Dandy wrote:Commander of what army? The RRA? TRR delegates do not control the RRA.
Not actually true of Fratt. He was both the Commander of the RRA and the Delegate of TRR at the same time.
Advertisement
by Evil Wolf » Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:24 pm
Space Dandy wrote:Commander of what army? The RRA? TRR delegates do not control the RRA.
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Blood Wine » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:55 am
Elke and Elba wrote:Well Mall, you want Haven? I'd want your Joint Systems Alliance badge, then.
Discoveria wrote:Port blood is a raider through and through. Honest.
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Salt Mines will be fueled for months by the tears of silly fascists.
[4:27 PM] Antigone: Port Blood = Gameplay JesusSedgistan wrote:Attempted threadjack on sandwiches and satanism removed.
by The Rejected Times » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:38 pm
by The Rejected Times » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:39 pm
by The Rejected Times » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:39 pm
by Whiskum » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:53 pm
The Rejected Realms Media Corporation wrote:It was this issue that proved the most controversial, as midway through the elections, in a truly remarkable and no doubt wholly coincidental bit of timing, The New Inquisition announced they were severing their Treaty with The South Pacific in response to the treaty with TRR. While the reunciation was emphasised "not to be seen as an act of war or hostility" by Minister President MagentaFairy, it was also starkly critical of Glen-Rhodes (Sandaoguo) for his previous questioning of their alliance, and of TSP Minister of the Army Geomania for some R/D crap, whatever.
The renunciation of the treaty with TNI was immediately hailed by Belschaft as proof that his darkest prophesies of the outcome of the treaty with TRR were accurate, but it was not enough to swing the election in his favour. That Sandaoguo was reelected to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs suggest many in The South Pacific do not share this sense of pessimism about the direction of foreign policy, or that they agree with Sandaoguo's anti-imperialist sympathies. He will now have another term to further his aims, which he had announced as pursuing interregional security not through doomed multilateral agreements, but instead on a gradual bilateral basis, and the success of that project on whether trading a bilateral agreement with TNI for one with TRR proves a wise decision in the long run.
by District XIV » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:54 pm
Following the deletion of Shadow Afforess for threatening the region of Haven with a password cracking tool
by The Church of Satan » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:11 pm
Whiskum wrote:TRR Times gives us yet another display of its disregard for the principles of balanced and well-informed commentary.
by Whiskum » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:13 pm
by The Church of Satan » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:14 pm
by The North Polish Union » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:38 pm
The Rejected Realms Media Corporation wrote:The Legitimate Point of View?
Independentism's influence over The South Pacific wanes
OPINION | GLEN-RHODES
Disclaimer: The following views are that of the author solely in a private capacity.
In early June 2104, the Assembly of The South Pacific found itself yet again debating the region’s stance on military gameplay – whether we are Independent, and what being Independent truly means.
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.
by Kringalia » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:48 pm
The North Polish Union wrote:The Rejected Realms Media Corporation wrote:The Legitimate Point of View?
Independentism's influence over The South Pacific wanes
OPINION | GLEN-RHODES
Disclaimer: The following views are that of the author solely in a private capacity.
In early June 2104, the Assembly of The South Pacific found itself yet again debating the region’s stance on military gameplay – whether we are Independent, and what being Independent truly means.
So the RR Times is writing news stories taking place 90 years in the future now? Does TSP's government have space colonies yet?
by The Blaatschapen » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:51 pm
The North Polish Union wrote:The Rejected Realms Media Corporation wrote:The Legitimate Point of View?
Independentism's influence over The South Pacific wanes
OPINION | GLEN-RHODES
Disclaimer: The following views are that of the author solely in a private capacity.
In early June 2104, the Assembly of The South Pacific found itself yet again debating the region’s stance on military gameplay – whether we are Independent, and what being Independent truly means.
So the RR Times is writing news stories taking place 90 years in the future now? Does TSP's government have space colonies yet?
by Glen-Rhodes » Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:09 pm
The fairy tale of independentism begins with a myth that this ill-fated ideology can find common ground between all regional mates, regardless of creed: the interests of their region. But this rational compromise collapses under scrutiny and practice. Interests are not a solidly defined rational construct, but an ambiguous morass that can be misinterpreted and misconstrued. With room for debate, common ground becomes a battlefield. The product of this clash, forces the region’s decisions to become less rational, even warped by partisanship – avoiding peace and cooperation to evade tacit association with “the other”, while the internal meritocracy of independentism devolves into sheer cronyism. The community relations of the independent region deteriorate as every issue and nearly every decision becomes an ideological space for catty dialectics and more identity politics.
by Unibot III » Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:15 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:I haven't really seen anti-raider among people who are neutral.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by The Dark Star Republic » Sat Jul 26, 2014 2:30 am
District XIV wrote:Following the deletion of Shadow Afforess for threatening the region of Haven with a password cracking tool
He didn't threaten the region of Haven, he threatened the author of the resolution "Liberate Capitalist Paradise" (Nierr) that he would release such tool to the world if the author were to pursue the resolution further.
Shadow Afforess wrote:Don't worry, the first region I will attempt to crack is Haven.
by District XIV » Sat Jul 26, 2014 2:54 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:District XIV wrote:He didn't threaten the region of Haven, he threatened the author of the resolution "Liberate Capitalist Paradise" (Nierr) that he would release such tool to the world if the author were to pursue the resolution further.Shadow Afforess wrote:Don't worry, the first region I will attempt to crack is Haven.
Shadow Afforess wrote:If the author here wants to play with fire, let's play with real fire: https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopi ... #p20886642
I promise never to release or distribute aforementioned tool if the author withdraws his proposal and does not propose new submissions regarding Liberating Capitalist Paradise.
by The Dark Star Republic » Sat Jul 26, 2014 2:57 am
District XIV wrote:Bolded.
by District XIV » Sat Jul 26, 2014 3:05 am
The Dark Star Republic wrote:and was the one to which The Blaatschpen and Scolopendra replied with the deletion notice.
by The Dark Star Republic » Sat Jul 26, 2014 3:09 am
District XIV wrote:The Dark Star Republic wrote:and was the one to which The Blaatschpen and Scolopendra replied with the deletion notice.
The post I referenced was the one in which Blaat and Scolo responded with the DEAT notice, not the post you referenced.
Reploid Productions wrote:Just to make it clear, proposing such a tool IS NOT what got Shadow Afforess deleted.
by North East Somerset » Sat Jul 26, 2014 4:49 am
by The Grim Reaper » Sat Jul 26, 2014 4:53 am
North East Somerset wrote:We aren't going to throw that away on a whim.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Haaton Prime
Advertisement