NationStates

Soviet Canuckistan said:
16,999 vs. 1, I like the WA's odds

It's now 17,300 vs. 7. And growing in my favor.

I am Galiantus, founder of The DCM, and warrior against the WA. If you want to join me, I invite you come to The DCM and help me put the WA in reverse.

To supporters of the WA:

Today I procaliam my undying determination to see the WA stopped in its tyrannicaI function, and inform you that I only need 300 active followers to completely halt the WA in passing any more legislation. Laugh if you want to. In fact, tell me I'm wrong. I want every bit of opposition you can throw at me so I can improve my strategy and win. Within the WA's own rules. But be warned... I will quote what you said about me when I hold the WA by the throat.

Galiantus wrote:growing in my favor.

The ratio is growing in your favor, but for overall number's vs. numbers, it's growing in their favor.

warrior against the WA.

It's been tried before so many times, and it fails over and over again.

put the WA in reverse.

Nothing you ever have done, are doing, or will do, has ever, or will ever, affect the WA at all. It's programmed into the game, and it will never go away unless the entire site goes down.

Today I procaliam my undying determination to see the WA stopped in its tyrannicaI function

Uh, newsflash, the WA is a democratic body. That's why they have those, uh, you know, votes for the resolutions they have.

I only need 300 active followers to completely halt the WA in passing any more legislation.

No, you don't. The WA is programmed into the game, and nothing you ever do will have the slightest effect on it no matter what.

Laugh if you want to.

In fact, tell me I'm wrong.

You're wrong in so many ways.

when I hold the WA by the throat.

[/quote]
Uh, except that that is impossible since the WA is programmed into the game. Nothing you ever do will ever have any effect on the WA whatsoever.

Fischistan wrote:

Galiantus wrote:growing in my favor.

The ratio is growing in your favor, but for overall number's vs. numbers, it's growing in their favor.

True

warrior against the WA.

It's been tried before so many times, and it fails over and over again.

I don't think anyone has had as practical an attack as mine.

put the WA in reverse.

Nothing you ever have done, are doing, or will do, has ever, or will ever, affect the WA at all. It's programmed into the game, and it will never go away unless the entire site goes down.

My plan has nothing to do with abolishing the WA, meerly making it impossible to function. (except in reverse)

Today I procaliam my undying determination to see the WA stopped in its tyrannicaI function

Uh, newsflash, the WA is a democratic body. That's why they have those, uh, you know, votes for the resolutions they have.

Example: If it wasn't for the WA, invasions would not be possible. [edit: And it is not really a democracy. It's more like an aristocratic democracy with a hint of olegarchy.]

I only need 300 active followers to completely halt the WA in passing any more legislation.

No, you don't. The WA is programmed into the game, and nothing you ever do will have the slightest effect on it no matter what.

See above.

Laugh if you want to.

Thanks

In fact, tell me I'm wrong.

You're wrong in so many ways.

Thanks again.

when I hold the WA by the throat.

Uh, except that that is impossible since the WA is programmed into the game. Nothing you ever do will ever have any effect on the WA whatsoever.

My deffinition of "hold by the throat" will not involve changing game mechanics until several years down the road, when the WA has been so useless even you want it gone.

Galiantus wrote:2. I don't think anyone has had as practical an attack as mine.

Uhm, you haven't even attacked yet.

3. My plan has nothing to do with abolishing the WA, meerly making it impossible to function. (except in reverse)

Gatesville, the largest region in the game, tried to do that for YEARS and YEARS an MORE YEARS and never ended up doing much. They had well over 1000 nations.

4. If it wasn't for the WA, invasions would not be possible.

Yes, but obviously you are focusing on the resolution passing part of the WA. If you want to do something about raiders, then join The United Defenders League, or any other defender organization.

6. Thanks

You're welcome.

7. Thanks again.

You're welcome again.

8. My deffinition of "hold by the throat" will not involve changing game mechanics until several years down the road, when the WA has been so useless even you want it gone.

see 3.

This is a puppet of Fischistan

Is this suddenly a UDL recruitment topic? Oh my bad

GV died a while ago and never achieved to do anything against the UN(for the oldies)/WA. Best way to fight it is to resign from the WA

DA YOO DEE ELL wrote:

Galiantus wrote:
Gatesville, the largest region in the game, tried to do that for YEARS and YEARS an MORE YEARS and never ended up doing much. They had well over 1000 nations.

Did they ever use invasion as a tool? Because with the meathods used by modern invaders I could easily beat Gatesville at efficiency with only 50 nations.

see 3.

See above.

Galiantus wrote:

DA YOO DEE ELL wrote:

Did they ever use invasion as a tool? Because with the meathods used by modern invaders I could easily beat Gatesville at efficiency with only 50 nations.

see 3.

See above.

If you have a raiding region with anywhere near 50 active people, I will certainly join you.

Galiantus wrote:

DA YOO DEE ELL wrote:

Did they ever use invasion as a tool? Because with the meathods used by modern invaders I could easily beat Gatesville at efficiency with only 50 nations.

Uh, how would invasions bring the WA down? enlighten me please.

DA YOO DEE ELL wrote:

Galiantus wrote:Did they ever use invasion as a tool? Because with the meathods used by modern invaders I could easily beat Gatesville at efficiency with only 50 nations.

Uh, how would invasions bring the WA down? enlighten me please.

I have drawn an interesting parallel between the WAs operations and the Black Hawks method for invading. Unfortunately, if I told you, you might find a way to prevent me from being successful while in my early stages of development.

Galiantus wrote:

DA YOO DEE ELL wrote:Uh, how would invasions bring the WA down? enlighten me please.

I have drawn an interesting parallel between the WAs operations and the Black Hawks method for invading. Unfortunately, if I told you, you might find a way to prevent me from being successful while in my early stages of development.

WA raiding operations have absolutely nothing to do with WA resolutions, at all.

DA YOO DEE ELL wrote:

Galiantus wrote:I have drawn an interesting parallel between the WAs operations and the Black Hawks method for invading. Unfortunately, if I told you, you might find a way to prevent me from being successful while in my early stages of development.

WA raiding operations have absolutely nothing to do with WA resolutions, at all.

Good. You'll never know.

There's something you're missing. Something big. Something Earth-shattering to NS.

Galiantus wrote:

DA YOO DEE ELL wrote:WA raiding operations have absolutely nothing to do with WA resolutions, at all.

Good. You'll never know.

There's something you're missing. Something big. Something Earth-shattering to NS.

You know, you have to be a member of the WA to raid. Are you willing to do that?

Galiantus wrote:There's something you're missing. Something big. Something Earth-shattering to NS.

...why does this sound like a bunch of hot air?

Quote me properly at least

Fischistan wrote:

Galiantus wrote:Good. You'll never know.

There's something you're missing. Something big. Something Earth-shattering to NS.

You know, you have to be a member of the WA to raid. Are you willing to do that?

With puppets I am.

Galiantus wrote:

Fischistan wrote:You know, you have to be a member of the WA to raid. Are you willing to do that?

With puppets I am.

you can't have WA puppets

Galiantus wrote:

Fischistan wrote:You know, you have to be a member of the WA to raid. Are you willing to do that?

With puppets I am.

Okay, now you're breaking your own rules if you do that.
Like I said above, this is a bunch of hot air.

Soviet Canuckistan wrote:

Galiantus wrote:With puppets I am.

you can't have WA puppets

You can have one at a time.

Galiantus wrote:

DA YOO DEE ELL wrote:WA raiding operations have absolutely nothing to do with WA resolutions, at all.

Good. You'll never know.

There's something you're missing. Something big. Something Earth-shattering to NS.

You do realize if you do somehow magically mess with the WA's functionality they'll IP ban you on site due to trying to bring down their site...

More or less, you do anything and God will smight thou's operations into dusteth!

Soviet Canuckistan wrote:

Galiantus wrote:With puppets I am.

you can't have WA puppets

I believe his intent is "I'll have a puppet nation for the WA".

Gawdzendia wrote:

Soviet Canuckistan wrote:you can't have WA puppets

I believe his intent is "I'll have a puppet nation for the WA".

he used plural so I interpreted it as many WA puppets

Soviet Canuckistan wrote:

Gawdzendia wrote:I believe his intent is "I'll have a puppet nation for the WA".

he used plural so I interpreted it as many WA puppets

I'm not saying you were wrong, just he probably intended not what he wrote.

Gawdzendia wrote:

Soviet Canuckistan wrote:he used plural so I interpreted it as many WA puppets

I'm not saying you were wrong, just he probably intended not what he wrote.

ok, but he probably won't succeed

Galiantus wrote:

DA YOO DEE ELL wrote:WA raiding operations have absolutely nothing to do with WA resolutions, at all.

Good. You'll never know.

There's something you're missing. Something big. Something Earth-shattering to NS.

I'm intrigued. Any way I can convince you to divulge your game changing tactic?

16,999