Page 4 of 11

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:31 am
by Cinistra
Bears Armed wrote:So, the raider groups that have spokesnations complaining about TITO's actions here do acknowledge the concept of 'natives' after all... despite past claims by various well-known raiders that it became obsolete once Influence had been introduced? And when members of any of those groups invade a region whose own natives then ask them to leave immediately, they'll do so?
:blink:

I don't acknowledge the term "native", and will never do. I am glad to observe that the fendas' actions in Osiris show the same. After this blatant imperialistic raid the air has finally gone out of the "we care for you" balloon. I have claimed fenda hypocrisy all the time, and has now been proven correct. Thank you.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:32 am
by New Rogernomics
Kanaia wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:So, the raider groups that have spokesnations complaining about TITO's actions here do acknowledge the concept of 'natives' after all... despite past claims by various well-known raiders that it became obsolete once Influence had been introduced? And when members of any of those groups invade a region whose own natives then ask them to leave immediately, they'll do so?
:blink:


Haven't you realized Raiders will say anything to further their agenda?

Now they will play the martyr card and pretend that big bad TITO was the aggressor here, and they were simply trying to help. They've used this propaganda before, they'll use it again.

Nice inverted logic.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:35 am
by Cinistra
Fenda intervention is aggression unchecked. It has always been, and will always be. So says the "gospel" of Grub.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:35 am
by Bears Armed
Cinistra wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:So, the raider groups that have spokesnations complaining about TITO's actions here do acknowledge the concept of 'natives' after all... despite past claims by various well-known raiders that it became obsolete once Influence had been introduced? And when members of any of those groups invade a region whose own natives then ask them to leave immediately, they'll do so?
:blink:

I don't acknowledge the term "native", and will never do. I am glad to observe that the fendas' actions in Osiris show the same. After this blatant imperialistic raid the air has finally gone out of the "we care for you" balloon. I have claimed fenda hypocrisy all the time, and has now been proven correct. Thank you.

And you don't see any difference in significance, in terms of rights to the regions in which they exist, between communities that have existed in their UCRs for several years and the scatterings of nations that have just moved (or been revived) into either of these newly-created 'sinks' during the last day or so?!? Bah!

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:39 am
by Tramiar
Bears Armed wrote:So, the raider groups that have spokesnations complaining about TITO's actions here do acknowledge the concept of 'natives' after all... despite past claims by various well-known raiders that it became obsolete once Influence had been introduced? And when members of any of those groups invade a region whose own natives then ask them to leave immediately, they'll do so?
:blink:


I've never claimed there are no natives. Certainly there are. And I'm not gonna leave a region because the natives tell me to. This is because I'm a raider. But we expect defenders to leave if natives ask them to. It's defenders that are always claiming native rights. That they do this for the natives.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:40 am
by Bears Armed
Tramiar wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:So, the raider groups that have spokesnations complaining about TITO's actions here do acknowledge the concept of 'natives' after all... despite past claims by various well-known raiders that it became obsolete once Influence had been introduced? And when members of any of those groups invade a region whose own natives then ask them to leave immediately, they'll do so?
:blink:


I've never claimed there are no natives. Certainly there are. And I'm not gonna leave a region because the natives tell me to. This is because I'm a raider. But we expect defenders to leave if natives ask them to. It's defenders that are always claiming native rights. That they do this for the natives.

And you don't see any difference in significance, in terms of rights to the regions in which they exist, between communities that have existed in their UCRs for several years and the scatterings of nations that have just moved (or been revived) into either of these newly-created 'sinks' during the last day or so?!?

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:41 am
by Kain_The_Dragoon
New Rogernomics wrote:
Kanaia wrote:
Haven't you realized Raiders will say anything to further their agenda?

Now they will play the martyr card and pretend that big bad TITO was the aggressor here, and they were simply trying to help. They've used this propaganda before, they'll use it again.

Nice inverted logic.
We are humans, and this is just TITO trying to make itself feel better for its invasion. You target nations that raised the Aretist banner who weren't even raiders, congratulations on a good raid and only banning those with the flags to try to justify yourselves.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:44 am
by Tramiar
Bears Armed wrote:
Tramiar wrote:
I've never claimed there are no natives. Certainly there are. And I'm not gonna leave a region because the natives tell me to. This is because I'm a raider. But we expect defenders to leave if natives ask them to. It's defenders that are always claiming native rights. That they do this for the natives.

And you don't see any difference in significance, in terms of rights to the regions in which they exist, between communities that have existed in their UCRs for several years and the scatterings of nations that have just moved (or been revived) into either of these newly-created 'sinks' during the last day or so?!?

There aren't really any natives in this situation in my opinion. Maybe the ones that have been revived there, but not really. But that doesn't mean that these defender groups aren't raiding.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:48 am
by Bears Armed
Tramiar wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:And you don't see any difference in significance, in terms of rights to the regions in which they exist, between communities that have existed in their UCRs for several years and the scatterings of nations that have just moved (or been revived) into either of these newly-created 'sinks' during the last day or so?!?

There aren't really any natives in this situation in my opinion. Maybe the ones that have been revived there, but not really. But that doesn't mean that these defender groups aren't raiding.

By that logic, isn't everybody except the verry first nation that appeared there "raiding"?

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:52 am
by Tramiar
Bears Armed wrote:
Tramiar wrote:There aren't really any natives in this situation in my opinion. Maybe the ones that have been revived there, but not really. But that doesn't mean that these defender groups aren't raiding.

By that logic, isn't everybody except the verry first nation that appeared there "raiding"?

One of the definitions of raiding I've gotten from defenders says that a raid is when nations that aren't natives of a region attempt to take the delegacy of the region using outside forces (other non-natives). So yeah, sure.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:53 am
by Mahaj WA Seat
ooh ban button!

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:59 am
by Kitten
Muh-ha! I joined the game to talk about politics now there IS politics. I shall reside in Osiris for a while, for the shits and giggles of watching everything.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:17 am
by Rachel Anumia
In other news... Balder is doing very well. Unibot was elected delegate and we're have a constitutional convention that welcomes all those interested in seeing Balder live long and prosper :)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:45 am
by Christian Democrats
Boo!!! "Defender" militaries shouldn't be invading the new regions.

Are ejections allowed in the new regions?

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:47 am
by New Rogernomics
Rachel Anumia wrote:In other news... Balder is doing very well. Unibot was elected delegate and we're have a constitutional convention that welcomes all those interested in seeing Balder live long and prosper :)

Certainly more acceptable, than Osiris is right now. Good to see you have made a great start. :)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:48 am
by New Rogernomics
Christian Democrats wrote:Boo!!! "Defender" militaries shouldn't be invading the new regions.

Are ejections allowed in the new regions?

Yes as Kain and several others were ejected several minutes ago from Osiris.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:58 am
by -St George
Cinistra wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:So, the raider groups that have spokesnations complaining about TITO's actions here do acknowledge the concept of 'natives' after all... despite past claims by various well-known raiders that it became obsolete once Influence had been introduced? And when members of any of those groups invade a region whose own natives then ask them to leave immediately, they'll do so?
:blink:

I don't acknowledge the term "native", and will never do. I am glad to observe that the fendas' actions in Osiris show the same. After this blatant imperialistic raid the air has finally gone out of the "we care for you" balloon. I have claimed fenda hypocrisy all the time, and has now been proven correct. Thank you.

TITO =/= all defenders.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:01 pm
by Rachel Anumia
Saint Thomas Aquinas: 'Rarely affirm, seldom deny, always distinguish.'

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:46 pm
by Aurora World
Rachel Anumia wrote:In other news... Balder is doing very well. Unibot was elected delegate and we're have a constitutional convention that welcomes all those interested in seeing Balder live long and prosper :)


hah, it seems that the Balder is much more peaceful... :meh:

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:51 pm
by Robin Hood
That was the point. :)

Elections for the leader among the legitimate enfranchised Balderites or Baldies as we've come to be known as will occur on Oct. 23 15:00 EDT. If you see yourself as wanting to become a native of Balder, please join the Constitutional Convention so you can be enfranchised in our constitutional debates and votes.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:55 pm
by Aurora World
I still hope Osiris will stabilize. I'll remain there, as I have one non-WA puppet in Balder, so we may be on touch on it's RMB ;)

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:00 pm
by Karak Eight Peaks
Bears Armed wrote:
Tramiar wrote:There aren't really any natives in this situation in my opinion. Maybe the ones that have been revived there, but not really. But that doesn't mean that these defender groups aren't raiding.

By that logic, isn't everybody except the verry first nation that appeared there "raiding"?

No, only those who have seized power, and kicked nations out. We have as much right to speak up against intruders as any other residents in NS. We don't need any outsider to tell us what's the best for our region. And yes, there is a raid going on. That's what you call it when outsiders enter someones border and seize power, so please skip the " " signs.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:10 pm
by Flaming Poptarts
Baldies are very peaceful. I hear rumours of high virility though. :eyebrow:

It is going quite well. I love the way the two new regions are starting so differently. It's going to be fun to watch them grow.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:11 pm
by Cerberion
For some reason when I read Kain's posts this song came to my mind:

Baby, do you understand me now
Sometimes I feel a little mad
But don't you know that no one alive
Can always be an angel
When things go wrong I seem to be bad
But I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood.

The animals "Don't let me be misunderstood".

I am sure the intentions were entirely honorable.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:14 pm
by Karak Eight Peaks
Who's intentions, if I may ask?