Wintermoot wrote:Scissoro wrote:Actually Wintermoot, Screw my last statement.
I have a region of 30 nations with 9 nations active in the last 24 hours on the forum. Your region has 460 nations with only 21 active. That means my region is 30% active while yours is less than 5% active. By that statistic, even though we are small, even though we blow up on one another from time to time, our region is far more active than yours. Good god, we would kill for a region your size, but if it means only 5% activity, I would rather stick with my small, instable region of 30
We have done everything right, beaten the odds, and came out with a superior system.
lol, such a poor attempt at an apples to oranges comparison. Almost any small region with a community will have a higher percentage of active members than a large region. That isn't due to a 'superior system', that's due to being a small region. However, if it makes you feel better to spin it off as 'superior'', then by all means. I'll be most interested in seeing how far your spin actually carries you into the future.
It has to do with age more than size. New regions, usually small, tend to have more activity because new players are new to NS, everything looks fresh to them. They also tend to be younger in RL, having lots a time to spend online. Most are in highschool or just entering college.
Larger regions are older due to the time needed to grow. Players are less interested with NS, many are sick of approving issues. They also tend to be older in RL. For e.g. many of us who started playing the game in 2004 are now in our 30s. Of course somebody's online activity is lower if you have a real job, family to feed, and children running around.