by The Associated Peoples » Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:11 am
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Bears Armed » Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:32 am
by The Associated Peoples » Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:43 am
Bears Armed wrote:Oops! Didn't get back to you about this, did I? Sorry!
As far as food plants are concerned, Resolution #52 (the Food Welfare Act) has already set up a seedbank. You'll need to alter your text so that you're clearly not trying to duplicate, contradict or amend the relevant section...
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Philimbesi » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:02 am
by Glen-Rhodes » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:10 am
Philimbesi wrote:Education AND CREATIVITY proposals don't have an area of effect.
by Philimbesi » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:27 am
by The Associated Peoples » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:31 am
Philimbesi wrote:Education AND CREATIVITY proposals don't have an area of effect.
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by The Associated Peoples » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:34 am
Philimbesi wrote:Nigel blushed... "I appologize I mispoke, excuse me for a moment..." Nigel then pulls out a trout and begins beating Max over the head...
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:36 am
IV. REQUIRES acceptable storage methods to be observed.
a.) Seeds are to be stored in four-ply, sealed envelopes and placed into plastic tote containers on metal shelving racks. The storage rooms are to be kept at −18°C (−0°F).
b.) Saplings are to be kept in nurseries.
c.) Genetic animal materials are to be stored through the process of cryopreservation, including the use of cryoprotectants at a temperature of 77 K or −196°C.
by The Associated Peoples » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:20 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Category: Education, Area of Effect: Educational is fine but there is no need to cover on the Seedbank due to GA#52.
The seeds of food plants would be welcome in the EPRF but that is not the sole intention of the facility.This is for all manner of organic materials it just happens to be that most plants are best preserved in seed form.The aim here is being prepared to replace any organic species in the wake of an extinction event. not just the food producing varietyCONSTRUCTS the World Assembly Seedbank to store seeds as a source of planting where seeds are generally unavailable, due to natural disaster, disease outbreak, and war, as well as to protect the biodiversity of food crops; such seeds shall be collected as volunteered by nations; the IFWO shall manage the distribution of seeds when needed.
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:IV. REQUIRES acceptable storage methods to be observed.
a.) Seeds are to be stored in four-ply, sealed envelopes and placed into plastic tote containers on metal shelving racks. The storage rooms are to be kept at −18°C (−0°F).
b.) Saplings are to be kept in nurseries.
c.) Genetic animal materials are to be stored through the process of cryopreservation, including the use of cryoprotectants at a temperature of 77 K or −196°C.
This block of text is a bit too narrow, as some member states may have better forms of preservation. Generally, we recommend that member states must make a good effort to securely store samples of specimens in an environment which does not cause it to disintegrate, or at least slows down the disintegration process. Something like that but no need to specify envelopes and temperatures, just reasonable measures.
-Ms. S. Harper.
IV. REQUIRES acceptable storage methods to be observed.
and leave out the examples.That does seem better to me.I tried to write this keeping in mind that not everyone has humans and other earth creatures on it and forgot all about the different tech levels.Thank you for pointing that out to me.IV. REQUIRES acceptable preservation methods to be observed.
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Sionis Prioratus » Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:52 pm
by The Associated Peoples » Mon Dec 20, 2010 7:22 pm
Philimbesi wrote:Education AND CREATIVITY proposals don't have an area of effect.
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Bears Armed » Tue Dec 21, 2010 4:30 am
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:10 am
I had this in the Perambulatory Clauses at one time but trimmed it as a redundancy.I thought that it really just duplicated Clause III.I could however after reading through it again change Clause III to read as...Bears Armed wrote:Clause III could reasonably, in my opinion, also urge the WA's member nations to supply those specimens for storage.
I also thought of this but was afraid of the house of cards scenario.I have however noticed that there were a few other resolutions that cited this in there body somewhere.Would the WASP still stand if Resolution #92 was repealed?Bears Armed wrote:Why not make the management of the facility or facilities concerned, and of the scientists involved, an additional responsibility for already-existing 'WASP' (i.e. the 'WA Science Programme')?
I was actually just thinking about this a few minutes ago.The fact that someone else brought it up makes me more inclined to do so.I am going to work on the wording to make it as inclusive as possible.I like the idea of sharing information with educational facilities and other establishments that would have a legitimate interest.Bears Armed wrote:How about including a clause about cooperation with "other relevant agencies", to cover the WA Environmental Council and any other international or national organisations that could also have legitimate interests in the matter?
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:19 am
A belated thank you for your show of support.Sionis Prioratus wrote:This is interesting. Maybe it could develop into something we could support.
Yours in building the Noah's Arc,
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Bears Armed » Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:39 am
The Associated Peoples wrote:I also thought of this but was afraid of the house of cards scenario. I have however noticed that there were a few other resolutions that cited this in there body somewhere. Would the WASP still stand if Resolution #92 was repealed?Bears Armed wrote:Why not make the management of the facility or facilities concerned, and of the scientists involved, an additional responsibility for already-existing 'WASP' (i.e. the 'WA Science Programme')?
by Sionis Prioratus » Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:48 am
Bears Armed wrote:The rules say that you can assign new duties to an existing committee (as long as you don't actually mention the resolution that created it in your text, which would be illegal for 'house of cards'...) and then if the resolution that created it ever gets repealed it would continue in existence with only the added role[s].
by Bears Armed » Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:20 am
Sionis Prioratus wrote:Appalled as we find ourselves by agreeing with what Tedd... erm, Bears Armed's representatives
by The Associated Peoples » Tue Dec 21, 2010 12:38 pm
oopsBears Armed wrote:Bearing in mind that it was actually created by Resolution #87, and then re-used by #92, yes.
That's good to know.I suppose that when trying to avoid legal issues one should not overlook legal benefits.Thank you for the info.I have some more editing to do.Bears Armed wrote:The rules say that you can assign new duties to an existing committee (as long as you don't actually mention the resolution that created it in your text, which would be illegal for 'house of cards'...) and then if the resolution that created it ever gets repealed it would continue in existence with only the added role[s].
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by The Associated Peoples » Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:10 pm
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by The Associated Peoples » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:56 pm
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:56 pm
by The Associated Peoples » Sat Jan 01, 2011 8:39 pm
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Jan 01, 2011 8:53 pm
by The Associated Peoples » Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:51 pm
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I'm sorry, but Ms. Harper isn't quite getting the hang on the category. One side looks environmental because it aims to rebuild ecosystems and the other looks educational as it tries to research. But something doesn't look quite right about the fact that it should be located in an Arctic region (and when I tried typing "arctic" it capitalised itself). Could it be coordinated between institutions instead?
Warzone Codger wrote:Well this is surely an interesting voting spilt.
You've beaten all 5 Feeders, XKI, Region Inc, Capitalist Paradise, (and edit: Gatesville) (the latter 4 being user regions who have more endos than one feeder) ALL voting against.
Intellect and the Arts wrote:Have you ever considered that there exist perspectives other than your own and equally as valid, or do you claim infallible omniscience by virtue of the houseboat you lovingly inhabit on de Nial?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement