REVIEWING Security Council resolution #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,
NOTING that soon after the resolution's passage, invaders left the region on their own accord,
SATISFIED to learn that South Pacific's legal government has been restored and the region is now at peace,
COGNIZANT that the native community has requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,
AFFIRMING their right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,
WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,
Hereby,
REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific"
The Security Council,
REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,
NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,
GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,
COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,
AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,
WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,
Hereby,
REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".
The Security Council,
RECALLING the passage of SC #108 in January 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific by invader forces,
NOTING that Security Council intervention through #SC 108 precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces 4 days later, and defenders have since restored the rightful government of South Pacific to its place,
GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 has now been achieved,
UNDERSTANDING that natives have requested the #SC 108 be repealed, so that full regional control can once again be return
WISHING to respect the natives' wishes and restore full sovereignty to South Pacific,
Hereby,
Repeals Security Council Resolution #108 Liberate South Pacific.
Proposal is self-explanatory. The original liberation was authored by me some time back. Recently I've been told that natives want it repealed because they want SP to become a normal region again. Hence, I've started work on this.
Support, we'd be more than happy to come back and throw a password on the place.
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:57 pm
by Eist
>COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,
If this has native support, then it seems reasonable.
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:09 pm
by Mallorea and Riva
Goddess Relief Office wrote:NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,
This is simply incorrect.
Just leave us be Mallorea
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:13 am
by The lepearchauns
As the current and elected delegate for South Pacific, I fully support the removal of the liberation. We have always been a neutral, open door region, and the liberation is a blemish reflecting the fact that some people dont respect that aspect of our regions culture.
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:15 am
by Feux
I am always a little reluctant to remove liberations from regions like South Pacific for fear that we will be passing another liberation six months from now - like Mall has implied; however, I'll vote for. Not entirely sure why. Anyway, this proposal should have no difficultly passing once put to vote.
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:16 am
by Mallorea and Riva
The lepearchauns wrote:As the current and elected delegate for South Pacific, I fully support the removal of the liberation. We have always been a neutral, open door region, and the liberation is a blemish reflecting the fact that some people dont respect that aspect of our regions culture.
I normally never notice the "Subject" line of comments but I saw that one heh.
Goddess Relief Office wrote:NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,
REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,
NOTING that its passage was followed by the withdrawal of invader forces and the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,
GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,
COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,
AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,
WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,
Hereby,
REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".
The Security Council,
REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,
NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,
GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,
COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,
AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,
WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,
Hereby,
REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".
The Security Council,
RECALLING the passage of SC #108 in January 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific by invader forces,
NOTING that Security Council intervention through #SC 108 precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces 4 days later, and defenders have since restored the rightful government of South Pacific to its place,
GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 has now been achieved,
UNDERSTANDING that natives have requested the #SC 108 be repealed, so that full regional control can once again be return
WISHING to respect the natives' wishes and restore full sovereignty to South Pacific,
Hereby,
Repeals Security Council Resolution #108 Liberate South Pacific.
Draft is self-explanatory. The original liberation was authored by me some time back. Recently I've been told that natives want it repealed because they want SP to become a normal region again. Hence, I've started work on this.
Mallorea and Riva wrote:We didn't withdraw because a Liberation was passed. I don't think we've (tbh) ever done that.
The massive UDL liberation that was launched took care of that for you....
The occupation of South Pacific was hilarious because the UDL liberation attempts consistently missed update. Frankly it was an amazing display of ineptitude.
REVIEWING Security Council resolution #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,
NOTING that soon after the resolution's passage, invaders left the region on their own accord,
SATISFIED to learn that South Pacific's legal government has been restored and the region is now at peace,
COGNIZANT that the native community has requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,
AFFIRMING their right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,
WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,
Hereby,
REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific"
The Security Council,
REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,
NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,
GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,
COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,
AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,
WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,
Hereby,
REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".
The Security Council,
RECALLING the passage of SC #108 in January 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific by invader forces,
NOTING that Security Council intervention through #SC 108 precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces 4 days later, and defenders have since restored the rightful government of South Pacific to its place,
GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 has now been achieved,
UNDERSTANDING that natives have requested the #SC 108 be repealed, so that full regional control can once again be return
WISHING to respect the natives' wishes and restore full sovereignty to South Pacific,
Hereby,
Repeals Security Council Resolution #108 Liberate South Pacific.
Draft is self-explanatory. The original liberation was authored by me some time back. Recently I've been told that natives want it repealed because they want SP to become a normal region again. Hence, I've started work on this.
Regards, ~GRO~
We know that it says on the Passed WA proposals the date of which a resolution is passed, but would using it in a repeal or resolution make it a RL violation?
REVIEWING Security Council resolution #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,
NOTING that soon after the resolution's passage, invaders left the region on their own accord,
SATISFIED to learn that South Pacific's legal government has been restored and the region is now at peace,
COGNIZANT that the native community has requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,
AFFIRMING their right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,
WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,
Hereby,
REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific"
The Security Council,
REVIEWING the case of SC #108, passed on January 24, 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific,
NOTING that its passage precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces and led to the restoration of South Pacific's legal government within a week,
GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 to free the region from invader occupation had been achieved,
COGNIZANT that natives of the region have requested the repeal of SC #108 to close this dark chapter in the region's history,
AFFIRMING the natives' right to self-determination and their desire to be free from limitations imposed by the Liberation,
WISHING to restore full regional sovereignty to the region of South Pacific,
Hereby,
REPEALS Security Council Resolution #108 "Liberate South Pacific".
The Security Council,
RECALLING the passage of SC #108 in January 2013 in response to the invasion and occupation of South Pacific by invader forces,
NOTING that Security Council intervention through #SC 108 precipitated the withdrawal of invader forces 4 days later, and defenders have since restored the rightful government of South Pacific to its place,
GRATEFUL that the goal of SC #108 has now been achieved,
UNDERSTANDING that natives have requested the #SC 108 be repealed, so that full regional control can once again be return
WISHING to respect the natives' wishes and restore full sovereignty to South Pacific,
Hereby,
Repeals Security Council Resolution #108 Liberate South Pacific.
Draft is self-explanatory. The original liberation was authored by me some time back. Recently I've been told that natives want it repealed because they want SP to become a normal region again. Hence, I've started work on this.
Regards, ~GRO~
We knowthat it says on the Passed WA proposals the date of which a resolution is passed, but would using it in a repeal or resolution make it a RL violation?
Why on earth would it? It happened in both RL and in the in-game world.
Hakio wrote: We knowthat it says on the Passed WA proposals the date of which a resolution is passed, but would using it in a repeal or resolution make it a RL violation?
Why on earth would it? It happened in both RL and in the in-game world.
Dates in nations vary greatly. Some take place on different planets and other cultures may think it to be a different year since most calendars are highly culturally subjective due to their ties to religious events. EDIT: Some take place in the future and the past also.
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Why on earth would it? It happened in both RL and in the in-game world.
Dates in nations vary greatly. Some take place on different planets and other cultures may think it to be a different year since most calendars are highly culturally subjective due to their ties to religious events.
Perhaps but the WA has a clear label on the resolutions that are passed giving a date for their passage. I think to state that it's illegal is an incredibly massive stretch that wouldn't stand a chance of holding up. Furthermore it's been done before.
Hakio wrote:Dates in nations vary greatly. Some take place on different planets and other cultures may think it to be a different year since most calendars are highly culturally subjective due to their ties to religious events.
Perhaps but the WA has a clear label on the resolutions that are passed giving a date for their passage. I think to state that it's illegal is an incredibly massive stretch that wouldn't stand a chance of holding up. Furthermore it's been done before.
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Perhaps but the WA has a clear label on the resolutions that are passed giving a date for their passage. I think to state that it's illegal is an incredibly massive stretch that wouldn't stand a chance of holding up. Furthermore it's been done before.
It's been done before? Well, nevermind then.
My condemnation makes a reference to the years that delegates were in power before I unseated them. This never raised any issues.
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:40 pm