[DEFEATED] Condemn Lazarus

by **Funkadelia** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:16 am

Where is the serious information? I don't see any :s

by **Solorni** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:17 am

The interesting question I have heard regarding this proposal after it became clear that the result would be one way was if the GCRs would all vote the same way on the issue. According to Kazmr the one lone GCR which has not yet voted is Balder. So it should be interesting to see if they vote in favour or against or don't vote at all.

by **RiderSyl** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:33 pm

Nephmir wrote:I didn't day I planned for it to fail. I just didn't care if it passed or failed.

You can't run away from statements made just a few pages ago.

Nephmir wrote:Oh please. If I actually wanted this to pass I'd have included evidence in the OP before submitting it, and would have made a more convincing campaign speech to the delegates.

Nephmir wrote:I won't be submitting another Condemnation proposal solely for the purpose of gathering data, however.

"I never wanted this to pass. My plan was to gather data! I swear this wasn't a failure."

At least you realized you weren't fooling anyone and moved on to claims of apathy.

by **Rifty** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:57 pm

Funkadelia wrote:Where is the serious information? I don't see any :s

For once i agree with you defender bae

by **RiderSyl** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 5:42 pm

This is turning out to be one of the most crushingly 'Against' vote results I've had the privilege of seeing in the Security Council.

If anything, this proposal is an argument for making it harder to reach quorum.

by **Topid** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 7:20 pm

Solorni wrote:The interesting question I have heard regarding this proposal after it became clear that the result would be one way was if the GCRs would all vote the same way on the issue. According to Kazmr the one lone GCR which has not yet voted is Balder. So it should be interesting to see if they vote in favour or against or don't vote at all.

Oh yes, it would be very interesting and not completely predictable if Balder broke with all the GCRs to vote the same way most of UIAF did. Who ever could have thought it was possible?

:roll:

by **Solorni** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 7:58 pm

Topid wrote:
Solorni wrote:The interesting question I have heard regarding this proposal after it became clear that the result would be one way was if the GCRs would all vote the same way on the issue. According to Kazmr the one lone GCR which has not yet voted is Balder. So it should be interesting to see if they vote in favour or against or don't vote at all.
Oh yes, it would be very interesting and not completely predictable if Balder broke with all the GCRs to vote the same way most of UIAF did. Who ever could have thought it was possible?

I didn't realize the UIAF voted, militaries generally perform military service in regions. If you are talking about the contributing and developed regions that participate in UIAF, then I had no idea how they are voting. Unlike some regions, we do not do things to fit in and look at things like that. In fact, the only reason I knew the other GCRs had all voted against was because someone had informed me of this trivial fact.

Please don't place your subservient defender thoughts and tendencies onto how you believe my own character behaves.

by **Yao** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:01 pm

Support.

by **Topid** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:03 pm

Solorni wrote:
Topid wrote:Oh yes, it would be very interesting and not completely predictable if Balder broke with all the GCRs to vote the same way most of UIAF did. Who ever could have thought it was possible?

I didn't realize the UIAF voted, militaries generally perform military service in regions. If you are talking about the contributing and developed regions that participate in UIAF, then I had no idea how they are voting. Unlike some regions, we do not do things to fit in and look at things like that. In fact, the only reason I knew the other GCRs had all voted against was because someone had informed me of this trivial fact.

Please don't place your subservient defender thoughts and tendencies onto how you believe my own character behaves.

Yes, UIAF is shorter to say than Albion, LKE, and TNI, and overall more preferred than "imperial sphere", I'd guess. If there were a better fitting word, I'd use it.

And like most gameplayers I did not have to look to know that was true. Votes are very predictable, especially on a pretty bad proposal like this. Only people with a real sour grudge with Laz would be open to this, and we know what group of players that is. Nor do I need to check to see that I am voting in the same way most of my fellow defenderists are, it is just relatively predictable that regions and players in similar positions will vote the same way. The only notable Gameplay region's delegates I see supporting this are LKE, Albion and the raider delegate in The Mountains to The East, and apparently possibly Balder. Them's the humorous facts.

Ah, are you a "character" now? I wondered what had happened to cause the dramatic change in tone while I was gone.

by **Solorni** » Fri Nov 14, 2014 8:12 am

I see it is easier simply use broad terms than correct ones. Given the aggressive extremism displayed by post-coup Lazarus towards Balder, it is no wonder why we do not oppose the measure currently.It would be predictable that in the face of Lazarus' awkward foreign policies, that a few of the rationally based regions would stand in opposition to it.

by **Topid** » Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:31 pm

Going to be supporting a lot of Condemnations if dismissing Balder is reason enough for one.

A lot, a lot. But nonetheless I certainly wouldn't hold that against you if there was something there, I've been away from NS for most part for all of PRL except the initial weeks of it.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Fri Nov 14, 2014 10:57 pm

"Condemn Lazarus" was defeated 8,053 votes to 2,095.

by **The Global Democracy WA** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 1:59 am

Thanks Fris for telling us that.

by **Nephmir** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:42 am

Frisbeeteria wrote:"Condemn Lazarus" was defeated 8,053 votes to 2,095.

Did I break the record?

by **Chester Pearson** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:22 pm

Nephmir wrote:
Frisbeeteria wrote:"Condemn Lazarus" was defeated 8,053 votes to 2,095.

Did I break the record?

For worst proposal ever? I do believe you did. Come on up and take a bow.... :clap:

by **Feux** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:52 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:"Condemn Lazarus" was defeated 8,053 votes to 2,095.

A sign that the world is with us comrades.

by **Chester Pearson** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:51 pm

Feux wrote:
Frisbeeteria wrote:"Condemn Lazarus" was defeated 8,053 votes to 2,095.

A sign that the world is with us comrades.

Maybe, but more likely that the world hates Nephy....

by **Feux** » Tue Nov 18, 2014 11:35 pm

Chester Pearson wrote:
Feux wrote:A sign that the world is with us comrades.

Maybe, but more likely that the world hates Nephy....

Or the content of his proposal? Your statement would imply the failure of Security Council resolution # 165.

[DEFEATED] Condemn Lazarus

Who is online